"7SK small nuclear RNA directly affects HMGA1 function in transcription regulation".
Sebastian Eilebrecht 1, Guillaume Brysbaert 1 , Thomas Wegert 2, Henning Urlaub 3, Bernd-Joachim Benecke 2, and Arndt Benecke 1, *
1 Institut des Hautes Études Scientifiques &
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique USR3078, 35,
route de Chartres, 91440 Bures sur Yvette,
France,
2 Department of Biochemistry, Ruhr University Bochum,
Universitätsstrasse 150, 44780 Bochum, and
3 Bioanalytical Mass Spectrometry Group, Department for
Cellular Biochemistry, Max Planck Institut für Biophysikalische Chemie,
Am Fassberg 11, 37077 Göttingen, Germany
*To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: +33 1 60 92 66
65; Fax: +33 1 60 92 66 09;
Email: arndt@ihes.fr
Received August 1, 2010. Revision received October 25, 2010. Accepted October 26, 2010.
Non-coding (nc) RNAs are increasingly recognized to play important
regulatory roles in eukaryotic gene expression. The highly abundant and
essential 7SK ncRNA has been shown to negatively regulate RNA Polymerase
II transcription by inactivating the positive transcription elongation
factor b (P-TEFb) in cellular and Tat-dependent HIV transcription.
Here, we identify a more general, P-TEFb-independent role of 7SK
RNA in directly affecting the function of the architectural transcription
factor and chromatin regulator HMGA1. An important regulatory role of 7SK
RNA in HMGA1-dependent cell differentiation and proliferation regulation
is uncovered with the identification of over 1500 7SK-responsive HMGA1
target genes. Elevated HMGA1 expression is observed in nearly every type
of cancer making the use of a 7SK substructure in the inhibition of HMGA1
activity, as pioneered here, potentially useful in therapy. The 7SK-HMGA1
interaction not only adds an essential facet to the comprehension of transcriptional
plasticity at the coupling of initiation and elongation, but also might
provide a molecular link between HIV reprogramming of cellular gene expression-associated
oncogenesis.
INTRODUCTION:
Small non-coding (nc) RNAs are increasingly recognized to play crucial roles in both, pre- and post-transcriptional regulation of gene expression (1). They may act to directly affect components of the chromatin remodeling (2), the transcription (3) and translation (4) apparatuses. Also, ncRNAs have been reported to affect protein stability, localization and post-translational modification (5, 6).
Among the best studied ncRNAs involved in pre-transcriptional regulation
is the 7SK RNA. 7SK is a RNA
Polymerase III transcript of 331 nt in mammals, belonging to the
highly abundant small nuclear (sn) RNAs (7). It
is stabilized by a g-monomethylephosphate-GTP
cap on its 5'-end, which is synthesized by the methylephosphate
capping enzyme (MePCE) (8, 9). The La-related
protein LARP7 has been shown to associate with the 3'-poly(U)
region of 7SK RNA, thereby contributing to the stability of the
RNA as well (10). Recent studies revealed that
MePCE and LARP7 act cooperatively to maintain the integrity of 7SK
snRNP (11).
7SK RNA is evolutionary highly conserved among vertebrates (12)
and is also found in higher invertebrates, such as Drosophila melanogaster(13).
Since its discovery in 1976 (14), it took a quarter
century until two groups
discovered a key function of 7SK RNA in the regulation of gene transcription
elongation (15, 16): 7SK RNA and
HEXIM1 or HEXIM2 bind to the positive transcription elongation factor
b (P-TEFb) and mask its cyclin-dependent kinase-9 activity, required
for cyclin T1 or T2-mediated phosphorylation of the C-terminal domain of
RNA Polymerase II. Thus, P-TEFb's role in RNA Polymerase II transcription
elongation is abolished. This mechanism is thought to establish negative
regulatory control of the RNA Polymerase II elongation activity as a function
of 7SK RNA nuclear concentrations for P-TEFb-dependent gene expression.
Several P-TEFb target genes have been identified to date (KLK3, IL8, CYP1A1,
MCL1, CKM, SLC2A4, NR4A1) (17– 21), and P-TEFb is known
to play a role in transcription elongation from the HIV long terminal repeat
(22,
23). With little surprise it was recently possible to also place 7SK
RNA at the center of Tat-dependent transcription complexes
(24).
The mechanism of 7SK RNA binding to P-TEFb and CDK9 inhibition is well
characterized and understood (25). Loops 1, 3 and 4
of the predicted secondary structure of 7SK RNA (see Figure
1A) are thereby directly involved in P-TEFb binding, and serve as a
molecular scaffold for the assembly of the inactive P-TEFb complex. When
P-TEFb is released from 7SK RNA to activate RNA Polymerase II transcription
elongation, these hairpin regions are covered by different heterogenous
nuclear ribonucleoproteins (hnRNPs) of distinct compositions, what
is thought to provide a pool of inactive 7SK RNA (26–28).
Loop 2 of the 7SK RNA is neither required nor involved in P-TEFb, MePCE
or LARP7 interactions. A crucial question remains with respect to the regulation
of this 7SK-dependent inactivation process. 7SK RNA, as a RNA Polymerase
III transcribed gene, is thought to be expressed at robust and constant
levels through most phases of the cell cycle and in most embryonic and
adult tissues (29). While 7SK RNA may serve as a buffer
to fine-tune P-TEFb to constant activity, it is conceivable that 7SK RNA
transcription itself or the stability, localization and availability of
the RNA are more tightly controlled by yet unidentified mechanisms. In
this respect, the finding that P-TEFb inhibition is not sufficient to explain
the physiological relevance of 7SK RNA is of great importance. A knockdown
of 7SK RNA in HeLa cells identified P-TEFb-independent regulatory phenomena
(30).
When 7SK RNA concentrations are diminished to less than 5%, P-TEFb target
genes are expressed at a higher rate, as expected due to the higher processivity
of the RNA Polymerase II apparatus. But also gene-expression not regulated
by P-TEFb or even expression from minimal, plasmid-coded promoters is both
positively and negatively altered with changing intracellular concentrations
of 7SK RNA. These observations clearly point to a yet unidentified second
function in transcription regulation exerted by the 7SK snRNA.
Figure 1. Purification and identification of a 7SK L2 binding
protein from HeLa nuclear extract.
Figure 1. Purification and identification of a 7SK L2 binding protein from HeLa nuclear extract.
(A) According to its predicted secondary structure (76), wild-type 7SK RNA can be subdivided into four stem-loop structures: loop1 (L1), loop2 (L2), loop3 (L3) and loop4 (L4).
(B) HeLa nuclear extract was fractionated by cation exchange chromatography (SP-Sepharose Fast Flow), gel filtration (Superdex G75 16/60) and cation exchange chromatography (SP-Sepharose High Performance), obtaining fractions with a specific 7SK L2 binding activity (upper scheme). The 7SK L2 binding activity of the fractions obtained after the final SP-Sepharose step was tested by EMSAs (middle panel). The protein content of each of these fractions was analyzed by silver staining after SDS–PAGE and most likely 7SK binding candidate proteins were identified by tandem mass spectrometry as indicated (lower panel).
(C) Increasing amounts of purified HMGA1a-myc/His (MH) (left panel) and HMGN1-MH (right panel) were tested for 7SK L2 binding activity compared with 7SK L2 RNA alone (-). Two nanogram of 32P-labeled 7SK L2 RNA were incubated with ~2, 4 and 6 ng of purified HMGA1a-MH (HMGN1-MH) and the resulting complexes were analyzed in EMSAs.
(D) Binding of 2 ng of 32P-labeled 7SK L2 RNA to ~4 ng of purified HMGA1a-MH was competed with increasing amounts of unlabeled 7SK L2 RNA. The resulting complexes were analyzed in EMSAs compared with 7SK L2 RNA alone (-).
We therefore set out to identify additional 7SK interacting proteins
in an effort to unveil such P-TEFb-independent mechanism of gene regulation.
We thereby used the loop 2 substructure of 7SK RNA (Figure
1A) as a bait, as this is the only substructure not involved in P-TEFb,
MePCE or LARP7 binding. We report that the chromatin factor and transcription
regulatory hub HMGA1 is bound by 7SK RNA, which in turn affects
its DNA binding and regulatory activities for over 1500 target genes.
MATERIALS AND METHODS:
Cell culture and preparation of extracts
Culturing conditions and transfections
HEK293 and HeLa cells were cultured as described previously (31).
Transfections were either performed by the
calciumphosphate coprecipitation method (32)
or by FugeneHD (Roche) according to the manufacturer's instructions.
Extract preparations
The preparation of nuclear extract and total cellular extract was
performed as described previously (33). To obtain extracts
for co-immunoprecipitation experiments, cells were reconstituted in isotonic
IP-lysis buffer (50 mM Tris/HCl, pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM ethylenediaminetetraacetic
acid (EDTA), 1% TRITON™ X-100, protease inhibitor) and homogenized
in a dounce-homogenizer before cellular debris was removed by high speed
centrifugation (16.000g). The extract was subsequently dialyzed against
IP-buffer (20 mM
4-(2-hydroxyethyl)-1-piperazineethanesulfonic acid (HEPES)/KOH,
pH 7.9, 100 mM KCl, 0.2 mM EDTA, 20%
glycerol).
Chromatin isolation
Fractionation of cytoplasmic, soluble nuclear and chromatin-bound proteins was carried out as descried previously (34). Cells were resuspended in two packed cell volumes of lysis buffer (10 mM HEPES/KOH, pH 7.9, 10 mM KCl, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 340 mM sucrose, 1?mM dithiothreitol (DTT), 0.1% TRITON™ X-100, 10% glycerol, protease inhibitor) and incubated for 15?min on ice. Nuclei were pelleted by centrifugation (1.300g) and the supernatant containing cytoplasmic proteins was cleared by centrifugation (16.000g). After washing once with lysis buffer lacking TRITON™ X-100, the soluble nuclear proteins were extracted by resuspending the nuclei in an equal volume of extraction buffer (3 mM EDTA, 0.2 mM ethyleneglycoltetraacetic acid (EGTA), 1 mM DTT, protease inhibitor) and incubating for 30 min on ice. Chromatin was pelleted by centrifugation (1.700g) and the soluble nuclear fraction was removed before the chromatin fraction was washed once with extraction buffer. Chromatin-bound proteins were eluted by incubation with SDS–PAGE loading buffer for 10 min at 95°C. The protein concentration of each fraction was detected as described previously (35).
Fluorescence microscopy
Mitochondria were stained with Mito-FluorTMRed 594 (Invitrogen) as
recommended by the manufacturer.
Fluorescence microscopy was performed using a TCS SP2 confocal microscope
(Leica) and the obtained data were analyzed using Confocal Software TCS
SP2 (Leica).
Molecular biology and RNA biochemistry
Western blot analyses and antibodies
SDS–PAGE and silver staining was performed as described previously (36). Antibodies used in western blot analyses were M2 anti-FLAG antibody (Sigma), anti-HMGA1 antibody (Thermo Fisher Scientific), anti-RAR-a antibody (Thermo Fisher Scientific), anti-LARP7 antibody (ProteinTech) or anti-MePCE antibody (ProteinTech) with the corresponding secondary horseradish peroxidase-coupled antibody, either anti-rabbit antibody (Cell Signaling) or anti-mouse antibody (Sigma) as recommended by the manufacturer. Western blot signals were quantified using ImageJ (Version 1.42q) (37).
Immunoprecipitations
Immunoprecipitations of FLAG-fusion proteins were performed with
M2 anti-FLAG agarose (Sigma) as
recommended by the manufacturer. Briefly, anti-FLAG agarose was
incubated with extracts containing FLAG fusion proteins in IP buffer (20
mM HEPES/KOH, pH 7.9, 100 mM KCl, 0.2 mM EDTA, 20% glycerol) for 2 h at
4°C. The agarose was pelleted by centrifugation and the supernatant
was removed. After washing three times with the 20-fold volume of IP washing
buffer (20 mM HEPES/KOH, pH 7.9, 100 mM KCl, 0.2 mM EDTA, 0.025% Tween
20), the HMGA1a-FLAG bound compounds were eluted in two steps with the
5-fold volume of IP buffer containing increasing concentrations of KCl
(500 mM and 1 M), before the FLAG fusion protein was eluted with the 5-fold
volume of elution buffer (100 mM glycine/HCl, pH 3.5). To detect RNA in
the elution steps by northern blot analyses, these fractions were extracted
with phenole/chloroforme and the RNA was subsequently precipitatied with
ethanol. In case the FLAG fusion protein was purified for downstream EMSAs,
the elution fraction at pH 3.5 was subsequently dialyzed against IP buffer
before use in EMSAs.
Purification of myc-His fusion proteins
HMGA1a-MH was purified using Ni-NTA agarose (Qiagen) as recommended
by the manufacturer. The extract
containing myc-His fusion proteins was adjusted to 400 mM KCl and
5 mM imidazole, before it was incubated
with Ni-NTA agarose for 2 h at 4°C. The Ni-NTA agarose was pelleted
by centrifugation and the supernatant was
removed. After washing twice with the 20-fold volume of washing
buffer (20 mM HEPES/KOH, pH 7.9, 400 mM
KCl, 1 mM MgCl2, 20 mM imidazole, 0.2 mM EDTA), the bound
proteins were eluted by four elution steps with the 5-fold volume of elution
buffer (20 mM HEPES/KOH, pH 7.9, 400 mM KCl, 1 mM MgCl2, 250
mM
imidazole, 0.2 mM EDTA). The elution fractions were subsequently
dialyzed against IP buffer before use in EMSAs.
Electrophoretic mobility shift assays
For electrophoretic mobility shift assays (EMSAs), 32P-labeled
or Fam6-labeled RNA or DNA was denatured for 5 min at 75°C and renatured
by cooling slowly down to room temperature. The nucleic acid was incubated
with
immuno-purified protein in EMSA-buffer (10?mM HEPES/KOH, pH 7.9,
100 mM KCl, 5?mM MgCl2,
0.25 mM DTT, 0.1 mM EDTA, 10% glycerol and 2mg
yeast tRNA per lane) for 10 min at 37°C and
subsequently for 10 min on ice. The resulting complexes were separated
by 10% native PAGE and visualized by
autoradiography (32P) or at UV light (Fam6). For competition
experiments in EMSAs, a double-stranded DNA
oligonucleotide with the sense sequence 5'-GGA AGG AAA CCA AGG GGC
GGA CCC AAA AAA CTG
GAG-3' was used. The double-stranded, Fam6-labeled IL2-Ra
promoter fragment used for competition experiments in EMSAs had the sense
sequence 5'-ACC GCA AAC TAT ATT GTC ATC AAA AAA AAA AAA AAA AAA ACA CTT
CCT ATA TTT GAG ATG-3'.
Affinity purification with oligo dT-cellulose
For affinity purification with poly-adenylated 7SK L2 RNA, oligo
dT-cellulose (Boehringer) was prepared as
recommended by the manufacturer. Briefly, the freshly renatured
poly-adenylated RNA was incubated for 20 min at 4°C with oligo dT-cellulose
equilibrated against oligo-dT wash-buffer (10 mM HEPES/KOH, pH 7.9, 100
mM
KCl, 5 mM MgCl2, 0.1 mM EDTA, 0.25 mM DTT). Cellular
extract containing HMGA1a-FLAG fusion protein
was applied to the column containing the loaded oligo-dT cellulose
and the flowthrough was collected. After washing with the 25-fold volume
of oligo-dT wash-buffer, the RNA-bound components were eluted by addition
of one volume of oligo-dT wash buffer containing 1mg/ml
RNaseA. The protein contents of each fraction were analyzed in western
blot experiments.
Total RNA preparation
Total RNA from transfected or non-transfected cells was either prepared as described previously (38) or using the RNeasy Midi Kit (Qiagen) as recommended by the manufacturer.
In vitro transcription
In vitro transcription analyses were performed either using nuclear extract from HeLa cells (33) or using T7 RNA Polymerase (NEB) as recommended by the manufacturer. To label RNA with 32P, the reaction mixture contained a 10-fold excess of 32P-labeled a-uridine-5'-triphosphate.
Northern blot analyses
Northern blot analyses were performed as described previously (31)
using specific 32P-labeled antisense RNA probes complementary
to the first 89 nt of wild-type 7SK or U6 RNA. To detect EBER2 7SK L2,
EBER2 7SK L2 m137, EBER2 7SK L2 m122/m137 RNA, EBER2-Lb RNA as well as
wild-type EBER2 RNA a RNA probe
complementary to the first 77 nt of wild-type EBER2 RNA was utilized.
Chromatographic extract fractionation
Approximately 100 mg of nuclear extract from HeLa cells was fractionated
by cation exchange chromatography
(SP-Sepharose Fast Flow, Amersham), gel filtration (Superdex G75
16/60) and cation exchange chromatography
(SP-Sepharose High Performance, Amersham) as described by the manufacturer.
After loading with the extract, the SP-Sepharose Fast Flow was washed extensively
with wash-buffer (20 mM HEPES/KOH, pH 7.9, 100 mM KCl, 0.2 mM EDTA) and
the flowthrough was collected. The bound proteins were eluted in two steps
with wash buffer containing increasing concentrations of KCl (340 mM and
600 mM). The fraction containing the 7SK L2 binding protein was loaded
on a gel filtration column (Superdex G75 16/60) to separate the components
by size. The elution was performed with wash buffer and the fractions containing
the 7SK L2 binding protein were loaded on a column containing SP-Sepharose
High Performance. After washing with wash buffer, the bound proteins were
eluted by a linear KCl-gradient (from 250 mM to 1 M) in wash-buffer (see
Figure
1B). The fractions were subsequently dialyzed against IP buffer (20?mM
HEPES/KOH, pH 7.9, 100 mM KCl, 0.2 mM EDTA, 20% glycerol).
Mass spectrometry
Visible silver-stained protein bands on SDS–PAGE were cut out and
proteins were in gel digested according to
Shevchenko et al. (39). Eluted peptides were
analyzed by liquid chromatography (LC) coupled tandem mass
spectrometry (MS/MS) on a Q-Tof Ulitma (Waters) under standard conditions.
Proteins were identified by database search of the peptide fragment spectra
using MASCOT as search engine (39).
RNA structure prediction
The secondary structure of RNA was calculated by RNAstructure (Version 4.4) (40).
Quantitative PCR analyses
qRT-PCR analyses were performed using SuperScript™ 2 Reverse Transcriptase
(Invitrogen), Lightcycler (Roche) and Fast Start DNA MasterPLUS SYBR Green
I reaction mix (Roche) as recommended by the manufacturer. Primers used
to quantify the housekeeping gene ubiquitin were
5'-GTT GAG ACT TCG TGG TGG TG-3' (sense) and
5'-TCT CGA CGA AGG CGA CTA AT-3' (antisense). Primers used to quantify
endogenous HMGA1 were
5'-TCC CAG CCA TCA CTC TTC-3' (sense) and
5'-CTC CTT CTG ACT CCC TAC C-3' (antisense).
Transcriptome analyses
For microarray analyses, RNA amplification, labeling, hybridization
and detection were performed following the
protocols supplied by Applied Biosystems using the corresponding
kits (Applied Biosystems, ProdNo: 4339628 and 4336875). The data obtained
were analyzed as described previously ( 31 , 41–44).
Transcriptome data, annotated to MIAME I+II standards, were deposited in
the public database MACE using Accession Nos.: 2970966830 (HMGA1), and
2979879726 (7SK) (http://mace.ihes.fr).
Probability calculation
To calculate the random expectation to obtain a given number of probes returning statistically significant fold changes in response to HMGA1 and EBER2 7SK L2, a hypergeometric distribution was used:
where m is the number of possible successes, n is the total number of elements, k is the sample size and x is the number of successes in the sample.
Constructs used in this study
EBER2 7SK L2 fusion transcripts
The EBER2 gene from -171 nt to +226 nt containing the complete viral
promoter sequence was cloned into the
EcoRI and HindIII restriction sites of PUc18 vector (Fermentas).
This clone was used to construct all EBER2 7SK L2 RNA chimeras. To obtain
the EBER2 7SK L2 construct, the sequence from +81 nt to +140 nt of wild-type
EBER2 RNA was exchanged by the sequence from +113?nt to +154 nt of wild-type
7SK RNA. To obtain the EBER2 7SK L2 m137 construct, nucleotides +104 to
+106 (CGG) of the EBER2 7SK L2 construct were mutated to GCC. In
the construct EBER2 7SK L2 m122/m137, in addition the nucleotides +89 to
+91 (CCG) were mutated to GGC. To obtain the EBER2-Lb construct,
nucleotides +80 to +145 of wild-type EBER2 RNA were deleted.
HMGA1a-FLAG, HMGA1a 3xDA/T-FLAG, HMGA1aDA/T1-FLAG,
HMGA1aDA/T2-FLAG and
HMGA1aDA/T3-FLAG
To obtain a vector for the expression of FLAG fusion proteins, the
hybridized oligonucleotides
5'-CTA GAG GGC GAC TAC AAA GAC GAT GAC GAC AAA GGA TGA A-3' (sense)
and
3'-TC CCG CTG ATG TTT CTG CTA CTG CTG TTT CCT ACT TGG CC-5' (antisense)
were inserted into the XbaI and AgeI restriction sites of the vector pcDNA4/TO/myc-his
B (Invitrogen). The coding sequence of wild-type HMGA1a from +1 nt
to +321 nt was inserted into the PstI and XbaI restriction sites of the
vector mentioned above. To obtain the HMGA1a 3xDA/T-FLAG
construct, nucleotides +82, +178 and +256 (A,C,A) were mutated to
G in order to change the codons at these positions from arginine to glycine.
To obtain the single mutants HMGA1aDA/T1-FLAG,
HMGA1aDA/T2-FLAG and HMGA1aDA/T3-FLAG,
the single nucleotides +82, +178 or +256 were mutated to G, respectively.
HMGA1a-myc/His (MH)
The coding sequence of wild-type HMGA1a from +1 nt to +321 nt was inserted into the PstI and XbaI restriction sites of the vector pcDNA4/TO/myc-his B (Invitrogen).
ShRNA knockdown of HMGA1
To knock down the expression of endogenous HMGA1, we used the expression
of short hairpin RNA containing a functional siRNA sequence targeting HMGA1
mRNA (45). The full sequence of the HMGA1 targeting
shRNA was 5'-CAA CUC CAG GAA GGA AAC CAA GCG AUU GGU UUC CUU CCU
GGA GUU G-3'.
For control, a non-targeting (scramble) shRNA was used with the
sequence
5'-AAC AGU CGC GUU UGC GAC UGG GCG ACC AGU CGC AAA CGC GAC UGU U-3'.
For downstream transcriptome analyses, these shRNAs were expressed
using a vector coding for the corresponding shRNA under control of the
7SK promoter. To verify the functionality of the shRNAs, we used a vector
coding for both—the corresponding shRNA under control of a H1 promoter
as well as the HMGA1a-GFP fusion protein under control of a CMV promoter.
Effects of the corresponding shRNA on the expression of HMGA1a-GFP fusion
protein were followed by fluorescence microscopy.
Localization studies of HMGA1a
To study the localization of HMGA1a-GFP fusion proteins during a
simultaneous expression of EBER2 7SK L2 RNA chimeras, a vector was used
that codes for both the corresponding EBER2 7SK L2 RNA chimera as well
as the HMGA1a-GFP fusion protein under control of a CMV promoter. To obtain
such an expression vector, the coding sequence of HMGA1a from +1 nt to
+321 nt was inserted into the XhoI and KpnI restriction sites of the peGFP
N1 vector (clontech). Subsequently, the coding sequence as well as
the complete promoter region of the
corresponding RNA chimera from -171 nt to +206 nt was inserted into
the EcoR109I restriction site of the
obtained HMGA1a-GFP expression vector. The expression of the EBER2
7SK L2 RNA chimeras was verified by northern blot analyses and the expression
of HMGA1a-GFP fusion protein was verified by fluorescence microscopy.
Localization studies were performed by confocal microscopy.
RESULTS:
Fractionation of cellular proteins probed for 7SK interaction
In order to identify additional, specific interaction partners of
the human 7SK RNA, we concentrated on the sole
predicted stem-loop structure (loop 2, comprising 110–172 nt of
the wild-type 7SK RNA, Figure 1A) that is neither
involved in the regulation of P-TEFb activity (46,47)
nor in the interaction with MePCE or LARP7 (9,10). HeLa
nuclear extracts were fractionated by cation exchange chromatography
(SP-Sepharose Fast Flow) into three fractions eluting at 100 mM, 340 mM
and 600 mM KCl. Each fraction was probed for 7SK L2 RNA-binding activity
in EMSAs, revealing that the 600 mM KCl fraction contained a protein binding
to 7SK L2. Following, the compounds of this fraction were separated by
size via gel filtration (Superdex G75). The resulting fractions containing
the 7SK L2 binding protein were loaded on a second cation exchange chromatography
(SP-Sepharose High Performance) and proteins were eluted applying a linear
KCl gradient from 250 mM KCl to 1 M KCl (Figure 1B, upper
scheme). Each fraction was analyzed for the presence of 7SK L2 RNA-binding
proteins in EMSAs (Figure 1B, middel panel). Almost homogeneous
protein fractions with 7SK RNA L2-binding activity were obtained (Fractions
14–16 from the second cation exchange chromatography; Figure
1B, middel panel). Gradient polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis of these
fractions revealed three potential candidates for the 7SK L2-binding protein
(Figure 1B, lower panel). LC–MSMS analysis of the visible
proteins revealed that they belong to the high mobility group proteins
HMGN1, HMGA1 and HMGN2 (see Table 1). Alternative
splicing of the HMGA1 gene transcript leads to three different splice
variants HMGA1a (11.7 kDa), HMGA1b (10.6 kDa) and HMGA1c (19.7 kDa) (48,49).
HMGA1b and c differ from the major variant by an internal deletion of 11
amino acids or a frame-shift before the third DNA-binding motif, respectively.
In the LC–MSMS analysis of the protein band matching, the elution profile
of the 7SK L2 binding protein of only the splice variants a and b were
detected (Table 1). To include also the 11 amino acids
lacking in HMGA1b compared to HMGA1a as potential interaction site, for
all following experiments recombinant HMGA1a protein or HMGA1a cDNA was
used. Recombinant variants of the two most likely candidates, HMGA1 and
HMGN1, were screened for 7SK L2 binding in EMSAs. While HMGN1 did not show
any complex formation with 7SK L2 RNA, we were able to identify HMGA1 as
the 7SK L2-binding protein (Figure 1C). Furthermore,
increasing amounts of unlabeled 7SK L2 RNA compete with the labeled 7SK
L2 RNA for binding to HMGA1 in EMSAs, confirming the specificity of the
complex (Figure 1D).
Table 1. HMG proteins identified by their corresponding peptides
in LC–MSMS
HMGA1 specifically binds 7SK RNA in vitro
We disrupted the secondary structure of the terminal stem-loop region
of the wild-type 7SK RNA by mutation of
three nucleotides (137–139 nt; Figure 2A; 7SK
L2 m137). EMSAs of the mutated RNA revealed a strong reduction of HMGA1a
binding which was not recovered by compensatory mutations of the complementary
strand
(122–124 nt; Figure 2A; 7SK L2 m122/m137), though
such a rescue should partially restore the original secondary
structure. HMGA1a binding thus occurs via the terminal stem-loop
structure of L2 and the interaction is furthermore specific to either the
tertiary structure or the sequence of the 7SK RNA. As increasing amounts
of unlabeled 7SK L2 RNA compete with labeled 7SK L2 RNA for HMGA1a binding
(Figure 1D), these results taken together confirm the
specificity of that RNA–protein interaction.
Figure 2. The 7SK-HMGA1 interaction is specific for the secondary
structure of 7SK L2 and the A/T-hook motif 1 of HMGA1a.
Figure 2. The 7SK-HMGA1 interaction is specific for the secondary structure of 7SK L2 and the A/T-hook motif 1 of HMGA1a.
(A) The secondary structure of 7SK L2, 7SK L2 m137 and 7SK L2 m122/m137
RNA was calculated
using RNAstructure 4.4 software (40). The nucleotides
are numbered corresponding to their position in wild-type
7SK RNA. The region mutated in 7SK L2 m137 as well as 7SK L2 m122/m137
RNA is marked in grey (upper
scheme). Two nanogram of each of these 32P-labeled
RNAs were tested for HMGA1a-Myc/His (MH) binding
activity in EMSAs using increasing amounts of purified HMGA1a-MH
( ~4 and 8 ng), in comparison with the
corresponding RNA alone (-) (lower panel).
(B) The intracellular localization of wild-type HMGA1a-GFP and the mutant HMGA1a 3xDA/T-GFP containing three A/T-hook motifs with disrupted DNA binding activity was analyzed by confocal microscopy. Mitochondria were stained to visualize the cell body.
(C) The IL2-Ra promoter consisting of the basepairs -136 to -6 of the human IL2-Ra gene was used to compare the DNA-binding activity of HMGA1a-FLAG with HMGA1a 3xDA/T-FLAG. EMSAs were performed with 100 ng of Fam6-labeled DNA and ~100 ng of each protein in comparison to the DNA fragment alone (-).
(D) Hundred nanogram of Fam6-labeled 7SK L2 RNA were incubated with increasing amounts (~50 and 100 ng) of immuno-purified HMGA1a-FLAG, the A/T-hook mutant HMGA1a 3xDA/T-FLAG or single A/T-hook motif mutants (HMGA1a DA/T1-FLAG, HMGA1a DA/T2-FLAG, HMGA1a DA/T3-FLAG).
The resulting complexes were analyzed in EMSAs in comparison to the
RNA alone (-) (upper panel). The amount of protein used in these
analyses was verified by western blot analyses (lower panel).
HMGA1a is a DNA binding protein containing three A/T hook motifs
(50).
The GFP fusion protein of a HMGA1
mutant (HMGA1a 3xDA/T) carrying single
R->G transitions in all three A/T hooks, which have been previously
shown to abrogate DNA binding (51), shows a strongly
decreased chromatin-associated nuclear distribution
compared with the wild-type GFP fusion protein (Figure
2B).
We verified this loss of DNA-binding activity of HMGA1a 3xDA/T
compared with wild-type HMGA1a in EMSAs
with a promoter fragment (bp -136 to -76) of the interleukin 2 receptor
a
gene (IL2-Ra), which has been previously shown
to contain defined HMGA1-binding sites (52,53).
EMSAs with 7SK L2 RNA revealed that HMGA1a 3xDA/T
shows not only a decreased DNA-binding activity but
also a significantly reduced ability to interact with 7SK L2 RNA
(Figure 2C). Furthermore, EMSAs of 7SK L2 RNA with HMGA1
versions containing mutations of each single A/T-hook motif (HMGA1a DA/T1,
HMGA1a DA/T2 and HMGA1a DA/T3)
identify the first A/T-hook motif of HMGA1a as the site of interaction
with 7SK RNA (Figure 2C, upper panel), since the same
reduction in binding affinity is observed with the single HMGA1a DA/T1
mutant as with the triple mutant. Moreover, mutation of either one of the
remaining A/T hooks does not reduce 7SK-binding in EMSAs when compared
to the wild-type HMGA1 protein (Figure 2C, upper panel).
Load controls thereby confirm the use of equal amounts of HMGA1 and mutant
proteins in the reactions (Figure 2C, lower panel).
HMGA1 co-purifies specifically with 7SK RNA
To verify a specific interaction of full length 7SK RNA with HMGA1a
in vitro, we immuno-precipitated purified
HMGA1a-FLAG in the presence of in vitro transcribed
7SK, U6 and EBER2 RNA. After extensive washing, the
protein-bound RNA was eluted with increasing concentrations of KCl
(500 mM for E1 and 1 M for E2), before the
FLAG fusion protein was eluted at pH 3.5 (E3). The RNA contents
of each immuno-precipitation step were analyzed by denaturing PAGE (Figure
3A), revealing that only 7SK RNA was detectable in the elution fractions
containing increasing concentrations of KCl. Neither U6 nor EBER2 snRNAs
were obtained. Thus, not only the L2 substructure but also the entire 7SK
RNA can bind specifically to HMGA1, which in turn does not interact with
the other control RNAs tested.
Figure 3. Full length 7SK RNA binds to HMGA1a-FLAG and endogenous
7SK RNA is associated with HMGA1a-FLAG in living cells.
Figure 3. Full length 7SK RNA binds to HMGA1a-FLAG and endogenous 7SK RNA is associated with HMGA1a-FLAG in living cells.
(A) Full length T7-transcribed, 32P-labeled 7SK RNA was
co-immunoprecipitated with purified
HMGA1a-FLAG in vitro by anti-FLAG agarose. The supernatant
(S) was removed and after washing three times (W), the bound
RNA was eluted (E) using increasing concentrations of KCl (500 mM for E1
and 1 M for E2), before HMGA1a-FLAG was eluted at pH 3.5 (E3). Every
step was analyzed for RNA by denaturing gel electrophoresis. T7-transcribed,
32P-labeled
U6 RNA and viral EBER2 RNA as well as an immunoprecipitation lacking HMGA1a-FLAG
(-) were used for control.
(B) Oligo dT-cellulose was loaded with poly-adenylated 7SK L2 RNA. Cellular extract containing HMGA1a-FLAG (+) was added and after extensive washing (W), the RNA-bound proteins were eluted by RNaseA digest (E). Unloaded oligo dT-cellulose treated with cellular extract containing HMGA1a-FLAG was used in a parallel procedure for control (-). Flowthrough (F), washing steps (W) and elution steps (E) were tested for HMGA1a-FLAG by western blot analyses.
(C) Endogenous 7SK RNA was co-immunoprecipitated with HMGA1a-FLAG from HEK293 cellular extract by anti-FLAG agarose. After washing three times (W), the protein-bound RNA was eluted (E) using increasing concentrations of KCl (500 mM for E1 and 1M for E2), before the HMGA1a-FLAG was eluted at pH 3.5 (E3). Extract (Ex), supernatant (S), washing steps and elution steps were tested for HMGA1a-FLAG by western blot analyses. Co-immunoprecipitated 7SK RNA was visualized by northern blot analyses (middle panel). U6 RNA (lower panel) as well as an immunoprecipitation of HEK293 extract lacking HMGA1a-FLAG (-) was used for control.
(D) MePCE and LARP7 co-immunoprecipitate with 7SK RNA and HMGA1a-FLAG. The fractions of the immunoprecipitation shown in (C) were analyzed for MePCE and LARP7 by western blot analyses.
Vice versa, oligo-dT cellulose was first loaded with polyadenylated
7SK L2 RNA as bait and then incubated with
cellular extracts containing the recombinant HMGA1a-FLAG fusion
protein, efficiently enriched HMGA1 protein from a HEK293 cellular extract.
This is evident from the western blot analysis of the eluted fraction,
obtained after extensive washing and RNase A digestion (Figure
3B).
7SK RNA interacts with HMGA1 in vivo
To prove the interaction in a cellular context, HMGA1a-FLAG was immunoprecipitated
from transiently transfected HEK293 cells (Figure 3C,
upper
panel), and co-purified RNAs were analyzed in northern blots utilizing
RNA probes specific for 7SK or U6 RNA (Figure 3C,
lower
panels). It is evident that significant amounts of cellular 7SK RNA
were released but not spliceosomal U6 RNA, which served as an internal
control. Hence, the interaction between 7SK RNA and HMGA1 in vitro
remains detectable even in the presence of high amounts of both competing
cellular proteins and competing cellular RNAs. Since the majority of cellular
7SK RNA is known to be associated with LARP7 by its 3'-poly(U) tail (10)
and MePCE by its 5'-end (8,9), we tested each fraction
of this
co-immunoprecipitation for the presence of these proteins. Indeed,
we could confirm the association of LARP7 as
well as MePCE with the HMGA1-7SK RNA complex. Both proteins elute
at 500 mM KCl from the
HMGA1a-FLAG fusion protein—in the same fraction as 7SK RNA (Figure
3D).
HMGA1a was described as the ‘hub’ of nuclear function for being involved in the majority of decisive nuclear events through its chromatin and gene expression regulation activities (48,49, 54). The finding that HMGA1 specifically interacts with 7SK RNA via its A/T-hook 1 DNA binding motif points to a regulatory function of this novel snRNA–protein complex.
In order to unveil that biological function, we controlled the amount
of free endogenous HMGA1a by over-expression of the 7SK L2 substructure.
For that, the promoter of the viral EBER2 snRNA gene was used, which is
one of the strongest RNA Polymerase III promoters known, resulting in more
than 107 copies of this 172 nt long nuclear transcript per infected
cell (55,56) (Figure 4A; EBER2 RNA).
RNA chimeras of EBER2 RNA (1-80 nt and 141–172 nt) and the 7SK L2 substructure
(113–154 nt; EBER2 7SK L2) as well as the two mutant 7SK RNA L2 substructures
(EBER2 7SK L2 m137 and EBER2 7SK L2 m122/m137) were generated (Figure
4A). Those constructs exclude any effects on P-TEFb activity as the
chimeras lack the 7SK substructures L1, L3 and L4 required for P-TEFb binding
(46,
47) (Figure 1A). EBER2 7SK L2 chimeras express to
high levels, as checked by both in vitro transcription analysis
and northern blot analysis (Figure 4C). The specificity
of the antisense RNA probes used in these northern blot analyses as well
as in the experiments shown in Figure 3C was verified
in northern blot analysis using in vitro transcripts as well as total cellular
RNA (Figure 4B). Furthermore, EMSAs verified that HMGA1a
binding characteristics of the 7SK L2 substructures are entirely retained
in the context of the EBER2 chimeras (Figure 4D). Thus
neither the EBER2 backbone (31) influences the affinity
of the L2 RNAs for HMGA1a nor do parts or the entire EBER2 RNA bind to
HMGA1a.
Figure 4. EBER2 7SK L2 fusion RNAs express at high levels and
conserve HMGA1 binding activity.
Figure 4. EBER2 7SK L2 fusion RNAs express at high levels and conserve HMGA1 binding activity.
(A) The secondary structures of EBER2-Lb RNA, EBER2 7SK L2 RNA, EBER2 7SK L2 m137 RNA, EBER2 7SK L2 m122/m137 RNA as well as EBER2 wild-type RNA was calculated using RNAstructure 4.4 software (40). The 7SK L2 substructure is highlighted in grey and the region mutated in 7SK L2 m137 as well as 7SK L2 m122/m137 RNA is marked in dark grey.
(B) The RNA probes used to detect 7SK, U6 and EBER2 RNA in northern
blot analyses were tested for specificity. Northern blot analyses were
performed with T7-transcribed 7SK, U6 and EBER2 RNA as well as with total
cellular RNA using equal amounts of the 32P-labeled probes targeting
7SK, U6 and EBER2
RNA.
(C) The transcription rate of EBER2 7SK L2, EBER2 7SK L2 m137, EBER2 7SK L2 m122/m137 RNA as well as of EBER2-Lb RNA was compared with wild-type EBER2 RNA in in vitro transcription analyses using HeLa nuclear extract (upper panel). The in vivo expression was checked in northern blot analyses using a 32P-labeled probe specific for the 5-region of EBER2 RNA (lower panel).
(D) Two nanogram of 32P-labeled EBER2 7SK L2, EBER2 7SK L2 m137, EBER2 7SK L2 m122/m137, EBER2-Lb and wild-type EBER2 RNA were incubated with increasing amounts of immuno-purified HMGA1a-FLAG fusion protein (~4 and 8 ng). The resulting complexes were analyzed in EMSAs compared with the corresponding RNAs alone (-). The HMGA1a-binding affinity of the corresponding RNAs is visualized as color code (green = high affinity, orange = medium affinity, red = low affinity). The arrow points at the resulting complex of EBER2 7SK L2 RNA with HMGA1a-FLAG.
7SK RNA competes with DNA for binding to HMGA1
High HMGA1 expression levels have been reported for both, embryonic
and transformed neoplastic cells (57–61).
The protein is readily detectable in the human adenovirus five transformed
embryonic cell line HEK293, using
immunocytochemistry as well as RT–PCR analysis. Recombinant HMGA1a-GFP,
co-expressed from the same
plasmid as the EBER2 7SK L2 m137 RNA mutant in HEK293 cells (Figure
5A), shows a nuclear,
chromatin-associated localization (Figure 5B,
lower
panels), comparable to HMGA1a-GFP alone (Figure 5B,
upper
panels). Simultaneous expression of EBER2 7SK L2 RNA and
HMGA1a-GFP results in a less defined nuclear
localization, concomitant with a significantly increased accumulation
of the protein within the cytoplasm (Figure 5B,
middle panels). To verify the decrease of chromatin-bound
endogenous HMGA1 upon 7SK L2 over-expression, a
chromatin preparation was performed from HeLa cells over-expressing
EBER2 7SK L2 RNA or EBER2-Lb RNA.
The amounts of chromatin-bound HMGA1 were compared with non-transfected
cells in western blot analyses (Figure 5C, upper panel).
The quantification of the western blot signals revealed a reduction
of the amount of chromatin-bound endogenous HMGA1 of about 50% upon EBER2
7SK L2 RNA expression (Figure 5D). The amount of chromatin-bound
RAR-a, which served as an internal control in
these experiments did not change significantly among the different conditions
(Figure 5D). These data corroborate the hypothesis of
a competitive mechanism of HMGA1a binding either to DNA or 7SK RNA. Indeed,
using EMSAs, competitive binding of 7SK RNA and DNA to HMGA1 can be demonstrated,
as the presence of increasing amounts of non-labeled dsDNA reduces the
amount of complex formed by HMGA1a and 7SK L2 RNA (Figure
5F and G). Interestingly, the competition can be specifically traced
to the 7SK interacting A/T hook 1, as it also readily occurs in the HMGA1a
DA/T2,
leaving only A/T-hook 1 available for DNA and RNA interaction, since the
A/T-hooks 1 and 2 have been shown previously to be the main mediators of
DNA binding (Figure 5F and G)
(51).
Hence, the competition also does not rely on unspecific steric hindrance.
EMSAs with the promoter region (bp -136 to -76) of the interleukin 2 receptor
alpha (IL2-Ra) gene, which has been shown previously
to contain several HMGA1 binding sites
(52,53), and
HMGA1a-FLAG in the presence of increasing amounts of non-labeled 7SK L2
RNA confirm the competition of 7SK L2 RNA with DNA for HMGA1 binding (Figure
5E). The competition could also be shown by the addition of increasing
amounts of full length 7SK RNA (Figure 5E).
Figure 5. 7SK RNA competes with DNA for HMGA1 binding.
Figure 5. 7SK RNA competes with DNA for HMGA1 binding.
(A) Schematic drawing of the constructs used for simultaneous expression of EBER2 7SK L2 RNA chimeras and HMGA1a-GFP fusion protein. The corresponding promoter elements are highlighted.
(B) The intracellular localization of HMGA1a-GFP alone (-) as well as in co-expression with EBER2 7SK L2 RNA or EBER2 7SK L2 m137 RNA was analyzed by confocal microscopy. Mitochondria were stained to visualize the cell body.
(C) 7SK L2 over-expression leads to a reduction of chromatin-bound HMGA1. HeLa cells over-expressing EBER2-Lb RNA and EBER2 7SK L2 RNA as well as non-transfected control cells were fractionated into cytoplasmic (C), soluble nuclear (sN) and chromatin-bound nuclear fraction (N). The presence of HMGA1 in each fraction was tested in western blot analyses. RAR-a was used as a control.
(D) The western blot signals of the chromatin-bound fraction (N) in C were quantified using ImageJ software (37) and the ratios of the corresponding signals after expression of EBER2 7SK L2 RNA or EBER2-Lb RNA and the signal of non-transfected cells were calculated.
(E) The IL2-Ra promoter fragment described in Figure 2C was used to study competition between DNA and 7SK L2 RNA or full length 7SK RNA for HMGA1a-binding. Hundred nanogram of the Fam6-labeled promoter fragment were incubated with ~100 ng of HMGA1a-FLAG in the absence (-) and presence of increasing amounts (500 ng and 1 mg) of 7SK L2 and full length 7SK RNA. EMSAs were performed to analyze the resulting complexes. The fractions of shifted DNA were quantified from three independent experiments, normalized to the shifted fraction in absence of competitor (lane 1) and indicated at the bottom of the panel.
(F) Hundred nanogram of Fam6-labeled 7SK L2 RNA were incubated with 100 ng of HMGA1a-FLAG as well as the mutant HMGA1aDA/T2-FLAG in presence of increasing amounts (500 ng and 1 mg) of dsDNA. The resulting complexes were analyzed in EMSAs. The fractions of shifted RNA were quantified from three independent experiments, normalized, and indicated as in (E).
(G) Hundred nanogram of Fam6-labeled 7SK L2 RNA were incubated with ~100 ng of HMGA1aDA/T2-FLAG in the presence of increasing amounts (500 ng and 1 mg) of dsDNA containing a specific HMGA1 binding motif (77). The resulting complexes were analyzed in EMSAs. The fractions of shifted RNA were quantified from three independent experiments, normalized and indicated as in (E).
HMGA1 target genes are affected in their expression by 7SK RNA
We next determined HMGA1 regulated genes in the same cell line by
comparing transcriptome profiles obtained after short hairpin (sh)
RNA-mediated knockdown of HMGA1 and control shRNA transfected cells. shRNA
was designed according to a published, functional siRNA, targeting HMGA1
(45)
and controlled by the strong cellular 7SK promoter. Expression of that
construct resulted in a significant knockdown of the endogenous HMGA1 mRNA
(Figure 6D). The knockdown was also verified on the protein
level using, however, a vector that allows the
simultaneous expresion of both the shRNA as well as HMGA1
fused to GFP (Figure 6A). The amount of
HMGA1a-GFP positive cells after co-expression of HMGA1 targeting
shRNA was compared with that after
co-expression of control shRNA, revealing a highly significant knockdown
of the HMGA1a-GFP fusion protein
(Figure 6B and C).
Figure 6. Knockdown of endogenous and exogenous HMGA1.
Figure 6. Knockdown of endogenous and exogenous HMGA1.
(A) Schematic drawing of the constructs used to verify HMGA1 expression knockdown on protein level. The expression of the corresponding shRNA (HMGA1 targeting or control) was controlled by the H1 RNA promoter. The target gene (HMGA1) was expressed as GFP-fusion protein under control of the CMV promoter from the same vector as the shRNA.
(B and C) HMGA1 expression in HEK293 cells was knocked down by shRNA in comparison to non-targeting control shRNA. HMGA1a-GFP was co-expressed with either control or HMGA1 shRNA using plasmids coding for both, shRNA and GFP fusion protein (see A). HMGA1a-GFP positive cells were counted via fluorescence microscopy. ***P < 0.01 in a Student's t-test. The error bars show the SD.
(D) The expression of endogenous HMGA1 in HEK293 cells was knocked down by shRNA in comparison to non-targeting control shRNA using a vector that allows the expression of either shRNA under control of the 7SK RNA promoter. The knockdown of endogenous HMGA1 mRNA was verified by quantitative PCR analyses. *P < 0.05 in a Student's t-test. The error bars show the SD.
Microarray analysis of RNA from HEK293 cells with knockdown of endogeneous HMGA1 using three independent biological replicates revealed a total of 2449 genes regulated by HMGA1 in a statistically significant way (P <?0.01). Most of these genes (2436 or 99%) were found to be up-regulated upon depletion of HMGA1, which is in line with the previous observations (48). Similarly, the relative effect of EBER2 7SK L2 RNA chimera expression on HEK293 gene transcription as compared with the EBER2-L2 backbone alone was determined using five independent biological replicates. A total of 2715 genes were identified to be regulated in a statistically significant manner (P< 0.01), when compared with the control. In all 1649, or 61%, is also statistically significantly (P < 0.01) regulated by HMGA1 (Figure 7A). This common subset corresponds to 67% of the 2449 HMGA1 target genes. Such an extraordinary concordance (random expectation P <4.9 × 10-324, hypergeometric distribution) between HMGA1 targets and 7SK L2-responsive genes can only be explained by a strong and a highly relevant physiological interaction between both molecules. Importantly, albeit most genes are repressed in their expression by HMGA1, we also identified several genes that are positively regulated by HMGA1 and 7SK RNA (Figure 7A).
An even stronger indication that 7SK and HMGA1 transcriptional effects
are closely related stems from the observation that the Pearson correlation
coefficient for the statistically significant co-regulated subset (R2=0.71)
is comparable to the joint set of genes regulated by either HMGA1 or 7SK
L2 (R2=0.66), and even to the subsets specific to either molecule
(R2=0.63, R2=0.48) in these completely independent
experiments (Figure 7A and C). Albeit not provable due
to the limits of statistical testing, the statistical correlations indicate
that the HMGA1 and the 7SK RNA-induced transcriptome profiles are not only
tightly linked but identical. The high correlation between gene expression
downstream of HMGA1 and 7SK L2 also confirms the quality of the experimental
techniques used that were previously thoroughly tested to minimize unspecific
effects from the EBER2 backbone used for over-expression of the 7SK L2
substructure (31). To further investigate the joint
gene regulatory activity of HMGA1 and 7SK RNA, we also compared HEK293
transcriptome profiles using the EBER2 7SK L2 wild-type versus the EBER2
7SK L2 m137 mutant, which shows significantly lowered HMGA1 binding activity
(Figure 2A). Again 333 out of 484, or 69%, of the 7SK
L2 regulated genes (P < 0.05) were found to be HMGA1 targets
(Figure 7B and D). Thus even when comparing the 7SK L2
substructure to the 7SK L2 m137 mutant, a large and perfectly concordant
set of HMGA1 targets can be identified. Due to the residual binding of
the L2-mutant to HMGA1 (Figure 2A), the relative effect
is diminished and harder to appreciate statistically. The common subset
of genes differentially regulated after HMGA1 knockdown as well as after
expression of EBER2 7SK L2 RNA in comparison to EBER2-Lb RNA (Figure
7A; yellow) is especially enriched in genes, which are strongly
affected by the HMGA1 knockdown (Figure 8A). In all,
293 (88%) out of the 333 genes of the common subset differentially expressed
after expression of both, EBER2 7SK L2 RNA in comparison to EBER2 7SK L2
m137 RNA and the HMGA1 knockdown (Figure
7B; red), also belong to the common subset of genes differentially
expressed after expression of both, EBER2 7SK L2 RNA in comparison to EBER2-Lb
RNA and HMGA1 knockdown (Figure 8B). Even though not
affected in a significant manner in every case, the expression of the genes
belonging to both subsets clearly appears to be linked (Figure
8B). The overlap of both subsets (Figure 8B; blue)
is enriched in genes, which are strongly affected among the common subset
differentially regulated after HMGA1 knockdown as well as after expression
of EBER2 7SK L2 RNA in comparison to EBER2-Lb RNA (Figure
8C).
Figure 7. The 7SK–HMGA1a interaction impacts the HMGA1a-controlled
gene expression.
Figure 7. The 7SK–HMGA1a interaction impacts the HMGA1a-controlled gene expression.
(A and B) The log2-fold change of gene expression after over-expression of EBER2 7SK L2 RNA (y-axis) is compared with that after a shRNA-mediated knockdown of HMGA1 (x-axis). Either the over-expression of EBER2-Lb RNA (A) or the over-expression of EBER2 7SK L2 m137 RNA (B) were chosen for control. Genes significantly regulated by both conditions are marked in yellow (red). Those, which are solely regulated significantly by the shRNA-mediated knockdown of HMGA1 are marked in grey and those solely regulated by the 7SK L2 RNA are marked in green (dark grey).
(C and D) Heat maps of the joint subset of statistically significant (at least P < 0.05) changes in gene expression between HEK293 cells over-expressing EBER2 7SK L2 RNA compared with EBER2-Lb
(C) EBER2 7SK L2 m137 RNA
(D) and HEK293 cells with a shRNA-mediated HMGA1-knockdown compared
with HEK293 cells expressing scramble shRNA. L indicates the log2-fold
change in expression, S indicates the signal, P indicates
the P-value and the roman numbers indicate independent biological replicates.
Figure 8. Comparison of the common subsets of genes regulated differentially between EBER2 7SK L2 and the two different controls (EBER2-Lb RNA and EBER2 7SK L2 m137 RNA) as well as HMGA1 knockdown and control.
(A) The common subset of genes expressed differentially after HMGA1 knockdown compared to the control were ordered by their log2-fold change (2449 genes in Figure 7A; grey). Those genes also expressed differentially after EBER2 7SK L2 RNA expression in comparison to the expression of EBER2-Lb RNA are plotted in yellow (1649 genes in Figure 7A). A density histogram for the enrichment of the yellow versus grey gene sets (bin-size 50 genes)is plotted against the log2-fold change in gene expression.
(B) The common subset of differential gene expression after EBER2
7SK L2 RNA expression compared to
EBER2-Lb RNA expression and HMGA1 knockdown (yellow) is compared
to the common subset of differential gene expression after EBER2 7SK L2
RNA expression compared to EBER2 7SK L2 m137 RNA expression and HMGA1 knockdown
(red). Genes significantly regulated
in both subsets are marked in blue.
For these subsets the log2-fold change of gene expression in
each condition is plotted on the x- and y-axis respectively.
(C) As (A), but for the yellow and blue (see (B)) subsets.
Among the genes regulated differentially by both, the 7SK L2 substructure
and the HMGA1-knockdown were various genes with a linkage to major cellular
functions
that are known to be regulated by HMGA1 (60–64). The
expression of several transcription factors (e.g. BTF3, CNOT3, EP300),
cancer-related proteins (e.g. TPT1, BCL7C, RELA), apoptosis-related proteins
(e.g. BCL2L13) and members of the histone family (e.g. HIST1H2BL) was found
to be significantly increased by the over-expression of 7SK L2 domain as
well as by the HMGA1-knockdown (Figure 9A). Previous
studies had already identified for instance MAP2K2, IGFBP2, SOX4, GNAZ,
STK6, CCND3, LAMA1, ACSL3, ARL3, COL6A1 (65), COX2 (64),
IFNAR (63) and HLA-A (62), as HMGA1
target genes which we show here are also to be 7SK regulated genes. Due
to the limitation of over-expression of solely the L2 substructure of 7SK
RNA, P-TEFb regulated genes were not supposed to be targeted by our approach,
which is confirmed when verifying the expression of known P-TEFb target
genes (17–21) (Figure 9B).
Figure 9. Genes with HMGA1 connected major cellular functions
are regulated by the 7SK-HMGA1 interaction.
Figure 9. Genes with HMGA1 connected major cellular functions are regulated by the 7SK-HMGA1 interaction.
(A) Different genes, up-regulated by both, over-expression of EBER2 7SK L2 RNA either compared with over-expression of EBER2 7SK L2 m137 RNA (grey bars) or compared with over-expression of EBER2-Lb RNA (black bars) and shRNA-mediated knockdown of HMGA1 (white bars), sorted by the functions of their gene products. The error bars show the SD.
(B) The expression of P-TEFb-regulated genes (17–21) is not affected at the chosen conditions.
HMGA1 is crucially involved in the vast majority of essential nuclear processes (48,49, 54) as well as in neoplastic transformation and tumor progression (57–61). A specific, functional interaction of 7SK RNA with the first A/T-hook of HMGA1a via its highly conserved loop2 affects HMGA1-DNA binding and consequently promotes positive or negative regulatory activity. 7SK RNA hence provides direct regulatory control of HMGA1 activity. This is, to our knowledge, the first report of a direct affector for HMGA1 function not acting at the transcriptional or translational level. As HMGA1 has both positive and negative effects on transcription regulation by other transcription factors such as the estrogen receptor (ER, positive) or the retinoblastoma protein (RB) and p53 which are negatively regulated, the amounts of free 7SK RNA directly affect a large number of transcription programs and cell cycle check-points by regulating HMGA1 function. The transcriptional programs of HMGA1 and 7SK RNA that we identify here and show to be virtually identical will provide rich information on the multitude of gene programs at the control of HMGA1 in transformed cells once analyzed in detail.
The disruption of the HMGA1-7SK snRNA complex by siRNA-mediated depletion of 7SK RNA in HeLa cells has led to the observation of significant effects on P-TEFb-independent genes without explanation of the underlying mechanism (30). The fact that 7SK RNA provides regulatory control of HMGA1 function is likely the explanation for the unexpected effects on gene expression independent of P-TEFb (30), as HMGA1 is known to interact with AT-rich sequences present in the minimal promoter-driven reporters used.
As 7SK RNA has a positive regulatory effect on the large majority
of HMGA1 controlled genes, and a negative regulatory effect on elongation
of P-TEFb-dependent gene expression, 7SK RNA establishes plasticity between
transcription initiation and transcription elongation. The relative amounts
of free 7SK RNA in the nucleus, and the opposite effects 7SK RNA has on
both transcription regulators indicates yet another intricate mechanism
of fine-tuning within the transcription apparatus. A potential 7SK snRNP
containing both P-TEFb and HMGA1 would raise important questions concerning
possible interlocking functions of HMGA1 and P-TEFb in gene expression
regulation and would directly link the modification of chromatin structure
(by HMGA1) to gene transcription elongation (by T-TEFb).
Furthermore, also possible effects of the hnRNPs, which have been shown
to replace P-TEFb from 7SK RNA, on the HMGA1-7SK interaction have to be
elucidated. In any case, the connection between P-TEFb-dependent and HMGA1-dependent
signaling via 7SK RNA which we uncovered here represents a new molecular
switch (Figure 10). The role that P-TEFb and 7SK RNA
play in Tat-dependent HIV transcription (24, 66–69)
thereby might also provide a molecular explanation for the HIV-associated
B-cell lymphoma and Kaposi sarcoma incident rates (70–73).
Increased titration of nuclear 7SK RNA into Tat-dependent transcription
regulatory complexes will, according to our observations, directly increase
HMGA1 activity. As increased HMGA1 activity is associated with virtually
every known type of cancer, the switch function of 7SK RNA might indeed
explain why 7SK RNA is an essential gene.
Figure 10. Schematic drawing of the regulatory switch function
of 7SK RNA.
Figure 10. Schematic drawing of the regulatory switch function of 7SK RNA.
P-TEFb consisting of Cyclin T1 (CycT1) and the cyclin-dependent kinase 9 (Cdk9) activates the RNA Polymerase II (RNA Pol II) transcription elongation reaction by phosphorylation of a serine (S) in the C-terminal domain of RNA Pol II. The interaction of the RNA Polymerase III transcribed 7SK snRNA with P-TEFb and HEXIM1 via its loop 1, loop 3 and loop 4 substructures (blue) leads to a decreased kinase activity of Cdk9 and thus to an inactivation of P-TEFb. Recently, the 7SK RNA P-TEFb interaction has been shown to be central to Tat-dependent HIV transcription. 7SK RNA released from the 7SK/P-TEFb snRNP is trapped by different hnRNPs, which is thought to provide a pool of inactive 7SK RNA. The methylephosphate capping enzyme (MePCE) and the La-related protein 7 (LARP7) have been shown to be stably associated with 7SK RNA.
The non-histone chromosomal protein HMGA1, assigned as a ‘hub’ of nuclear function, alters chromatin structure being an antagonist of histone 1 (H1). In addition, it also alters the affinity of several transcription factors (TF) for DNA. That way HMGA1 impacts the expression of many RNA Polymerase II transcribed genes connected to essential cellular processes as well as several oncogenes, leading in case of increased amounts of HMGA1 to malignant transformation. We identified the loop 2 substructure of 7SK RNA (green) to specifically interact with HMGA1 and we identified more than 1500 HMGA1-dependent genes to be controlled by this interaction. Our results point to a switch function of 7SK RNA between RNA Polymerase II transcription elongation and alteration of chromatin structure. Thereby, the 7SK RNA might be central to the plasticity between transcription initiation and elongation, an equilibrium likely to be affected by HMGA1 over-expression in cancer and HIV-driven reprogramming of cellular transcription through the increased titration of 7SK RNA into HMGA1 or P-TEFb complexes, respectively. Interestingly, this competitive link between major transcription regulation complexes established by 7SK RNA might also be a molecular explanation for the development of HIV infection-associated lymphomas and Kaposi sarcomas.
Interestingly, also is the fact that the 7SK-HMGA1 complex represents a novel link between RNA Polymerase II and III gene expression programs. While examples of RNA Polymerase III transcripts affecting RNA Polymerase II-driven gene expression and RNA processing, such as the U6 RNA and its role in splicing (74), exist, the observation of a RNA Polymerase III transcribed gene directly regulating RNA Polymerase II transcription initiation on such a large scale, raises important questions as to the functional inter-dependence of both transcription machines. Furthermore, renewed interest should be accorded to the question of regulatory phenomena in RNA Polymerase III transcription (75). As non-translated RNAs are rarely quantified on widely used microarray technology, and also for technical reasons are only seldom captured in SAGE analysis, we know too little about variations in gene expression patterns of RNA Polymerase III transcripts especially in oncogenesis and viral infection.
Considering the direct connection between the de-repression of
HMGA1 and cancerogenesis (57–61), over-expression
of the 7SK L2 substructure might establish a powerful tool to control the
activity of endogenous HMGA1 in physiopathology. From our work it comes
that regulating 7SK RNA expression will directly, positively or negatively
affect HMGA1 activity (Figure 10). The plasticity between
the control of transcription elongation by P-TEFb and of chromatin and
transcription regulation by HMGA1 established by 7SK snRNA might be highly
relevant for HIV-induced reprogramming of cellular and viral gene expression,
and furthermore raises important questions regarding the control of RNA
Polymerase III gene transcription (75). The intertwined
regulation via 7SK RNA of the control of transcription elongation (by
P-TEFb) and of the control of gene activity (by HMGA1) assigns
a major role to that snRNA as a molecular switch for nuclear key functions
(Figure 10).
FUNDING:
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS); the Region Nord;
the Genopole Evry (all to A.B.); Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (BE 531/19-3,
to B.-J.B.).
Funding for open access charge: Genopole Every (to A.B.).
Conflict of interest statement. None declared.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS:
We thank Axel Witt for providing the northern blot probes specific for 7SK, U6 and EBER2 RNA. We thank Christina Klein-Schmidt for help with confocal microscopy. We are grateful to Brendan Bell for his helpful comments on the manuscript. Hélène Léger and Nicolas Tchitchek are thanked for instructions on the use of the microarray and relevant statistical analysis technologies.
© The Author(s) 2010. Published by Oxford University Press.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the
Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5),
which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction
in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
REFERENCES:
1. Morey C, Avner P
Employment opportunities for
non-coding RNAs. FEBS Lett 2004;567:27-34.
2. Malecova B, Morris KV
Transcriptional gene silencing through
epigenetic changes mediated by non-coding RNAs. Curr. Opin. Mol.
Ther. 2010;12:214-222.
3. Barrandon C, Spiluttini B, Bensaude
O
Non-coding RNAs regulating the transcriptional
machinery. Biol. Cell 2008;100:83-95.
4. Cannell IG, Kong YW, Bushell M
How do microRNAs regulate gene expression?
Biochem. Soc. Trans. 2008;36:1224-1231.
5. Grudnik P, Bange G, Sinning I
Protein targeting by the signal recognition
particle. Biol. Chem. 2009;390:775-782.
6. Ikegami K, Ohgane J, Tanaka S,
Yagi S, Shiota K
Interplay between DNA methylation, histone
modification and chromatin remodeling in stem cells and
during development. Int. J. Dev. Biol.
2009;53:203-214.
7. Gurney T Jr., Eliceiri GL
Intracellular distribution of low molecular
weight RNA species in HeLa cells. J. Cell. Biol. 1980;87:398-403.
8. Gupta S, Busch RK, Singh R,
Reddy R
Characterization of U6 small nuclear RNA
cap-specific antibodies. Identification of
gamma-monomethyl-GTP cap structure in 7SK
and several other human small RNAs. J. Biol. Chem.
1990;265:19137-19142.
9. Shumyatsky GP, Tillib SV, Kramerov DA
B2 RNA and 7SK RNA, RNA Polymerase III
transcripts, have a cap-like structure at their 5? end. Nucleic
Acids Res. 1990;18:6347-6351.
10. He N, Jahchan NS, Hong E,
Li Q, Bayfield MA, Maraia RJ, Luo K, Zhou Q
A La-related protein modulates 7SK snRNP
integrity to suppress P-TEFb-dependent transcriptional
elongation and tumorigenesis. Mol. Cell
2008;29:588-599.
11. Xue Y, Yang Z, Chen R, Zhou Q
A capping-independent function of MePCE
in stabilizing 7SK snRNA and facilitating the assembly of 7SK
snRNP. Nucleic Acids Res.38:360-369.
12. Gursoy HC, Koper D, Benecke BJ
The vertebrate 7S K RNA separates hagfish
(Myxine glutinosa) and lamprey (Lampetra fluviatilis). J.
Mol.
Evol. 2000;50:456-464.
13. Gruber AR, Koper-Emde D,
Marz M, Tafer H, Bernhart S, Obernosterer G, Mosig
A, Hofacker IL,
Stadler PF,
Benecke BJ
Invertebrate 7SK snRNAs. J. Mol. Evol.
2008;66:107-115.
14. Zieve G, Penman S
Small RNA species of the HeLa cell: metabolism
and subcellular localization. Cell 1976;8:19-31.
15. Nguyen VT, Kiss T, Michels AA, Bensaude
O
7SK small nuclear RNA binds to and inhibits
the activity of CDK9/cyclin T complexes. Nature
2001;414:322-325.
16. Yang Z, Zhu Q, Luo K, Zhou Q
The 7SK small nuclear RNA inhibits the
CDK9/cyclin T1 kinase to control transcription. Nature
2001;414:317-322.
17. Barboric M, Nissen RM, Kanazawa S,
Jabrane-Ferrat N, Peterlin BM
NF-kappaB binds P-TEFb to stimulate transcriptional
elongation by RNA Polymerase II. Mol. Cell
2001;8:327-337.
18. Lam LT, Pickeral OK, Peng AC, Rosenwald
A, Hurt EM, Giltnane JM, Averett LM, Zhao H,
Davis RE, Sathyamoorthy
M, 11.et al
Genomic-scale measurement of mRNA turnover
and the mechanisms of action of the anti-cancer drug
flavopiridol. Genome Biol. 2001;2. RESEARCH0041.
19. Lee DK, Duan HO, Chang C
Androgen receptor interacts with the positive
elongation factor P-TEFb and enhances the efficiency of
transcriptional elongation. J. Biol. Chem.
2001;276:9978-9984.
20. Nojima M, Huang Y, Tyagi M, Kao
HY, Fujinaga K
The positive transcription elongation factor
b is an essential cofactor for the activation of transcription by
myocyte enhancer factor 2. J. Mol. Biol.
2008;382:275-287.
21. Tian Y, Ke S, Chen M, Sheng T
Interactions between the aryl hydrocarbon
receptor and P-TEFb. Sequential recruitment of transcription
factors and differential phosphorylation
of C-terminal domain of RNA Polymerase II at cyp1a1 promoter. J.
Biol. Chem. 2003;278:44041-44048.
22. Wei P, Garber ME, Fang SM, Fischer
WH, Jones KA
A novel CDK9-associated C-type cyclin interacts
directly with HIV-1 Tat and mediates its high-affinity,
loop-specific binding to TAR RNA. Cell
1998;92:451-462.
23. Zhu Y, Pe'ery T, Peng J, Ramanathan
Y, Marshall N, Marshall T, Amendt B, Mathews MB,
Price DH
Trans.cription elongation factor P-TEFb
is required for HIV-1 tat transactivation in vitro. Genes Dev.
1997;11:2622-2632.
24. Sobhian B, Laguette N, Yatim A, Nakamura
M, Levy Y, Kiernan R, Benkirane M
HIV-1 Tat assembles a multifunctional transcription
elongation complex and stably associates with the 7SK
snRNP. Mol. Cell 38: 439-451.
25. Diribarne G, Bensaude O
7SK RNA, a non-coding RNA regulating
P-TEFb, a general transcription factor. RNA Biol. 2009;6:122-128.
26. Barrandon C, Bonnet F, Nguyen VT, Labas
V, Bensaude O
The transcription-dependent dissociation
of P-TEFb-HEXIM1-7SK RNA relies upon formation of
hnRNP-7SK RNA complexes. Mol. Cell. Biol.
2007;27:6996-7006.
27. Van Herreweghe E, Egloff S, Goiffon I,
Jady BE, Froment C, Monsarrat B, Kiss T
Dynamic remodelling of human
7SK snRNP controls the nuclear level of active P-TEFb. EMBO J.
2007;26:3570-3580.
28. Hogg JR, Collins K
RNA-based affinity purification reveals
7SK RNPs with distinct composition and regulation. RNA
2007;13:868-880.
29. Paule MR, White RJ
Survey and summary: transcription
by RNA Polymerases I and III. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000;28:1283-1298.
30. Haaland RE, Herrmann CH, Rice AP
siRNA depletion of 7SK snRNA
induces apoptosis but does not affect expression of the HIV-1 LTR or
P-TEFb-dependent cellular genes. J. Cell.
Physiol. 2005;205:463-470.
31. Eilebrecht S, Pellay FX, Odenwalder
P, Brysbaert G, Benecke BJ, Benecke A
EBER2 RNA-induced transcriptome
changes identify cellular processes likely targeted during Epstein Barr
Virus infection. BMC Res. Notes
2008;1:100.
32. Graham FL, van der Eb AJ
A new technique for the assay
of infectivity of human adenovirus 5 DNA. Virology 1973;52:456-467.
33. Dignam JD, Lebovitz RM, Roeder RG
Accurate transcription initiation
by RNA Polymerase II in a soluble extract from isolated mammalian nuclei.
Nucleic Acids Res. 1983;11:1475-1489.
34. Wysocka J, Reilly PT, Herr W
Loss of HCF-1-chromatin association
precedes temperature-induced growth arrest of tsBN67 cells. Mol.
Cell. Biol. 2001;21:3820-3829.
35. Bradford MM
A rapid and sensitive method
for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle
of protein-dye binding. Anal. Biochem.
1976;72:248-254.
36. Laemmli UK
Cleavage of structural proteins
during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature
1970;227:680-685.
37. Abramoff MD, Magelhaes PJ, Ram SJ
Image Processing with ImageJ.
Biophotonics Int. 2004;11:36-42.
38. Chomczynski P, Sacchi N
Single-step method of RNA isolation
by acid guanidinium thiocyanate-phenol-chloroform extraction. Anal.
Biochem. 1987;162:156-159.
39. Shevchenko A, Wilm M, Vorm O, Mann M
Mass spectrometric sequencing of proteins
silver-stained polyacrylamide gels. Anal. Chem.
1996;68:850-858.
40. Zuker M
Computer prediction of RNA structure. Methods
Enzymol. 1989;180:262-288.
41. Noth S, Benecke A
Avoiding inconsistencies over time and
tracking difficulties in Applied Biosystems AB1700/Panther
probe-to-gene annotations. BMC Bioinformatics
2005;6:307.
42. Noth S, Brysbaert G, Benecke A
Normalization using weighted negative
second order exponential error functions (NeONORM) provides
robustness against asymmetries in comparative
transcriptome profiles and avoids false calls. Genomics
Proteomics Bioinformatics 2006;4:90-109.
43. Noth S, Brysbaert G, Pellay FX, Benecke A
High-sensitivity transcriptome data
structure and implications for analysis and biologic interpretation.
Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics 2006;4:212-229.
44. Wilhelm E, Kornete M, Targat B, Vigneault-Edwards J,
Frontini M, Tora L, Benecke A, Bell B
TAF6delta orchestrates an apoptotic
transcriptome profile and interacts functionally with p53. BMC Mol.
Biol.11:10.
45. Liau SS, Ashley SW, Whang EE
Lentivirus-mediated RNA interference of
HMGA1 promotes chemosensitivity to gemcitabine in pancreatic
adenocarcinoma. J. Gastrointest. Surg 2006;10:1254-1262.
discussion 1263.
46. Egloff S, Van Herreweghe E, Kiss T
Regulation of Polymerase II transcription
by 7SK snRNA: two distinct RNA elements direct P-TEFb and
HEXIM1 binding. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2006;26:630-642.
47. Van Herreweghe E, Egloff S, Goiffon I,
Jady BE, Froment C, Monsarrat B, Kiss T
Dynamic remodelling of human 7SK
snRNP controls the nuclear level of active P-TEFb. EMBO J.
2007;26:3570-3580.
48. Reeves R, Beckerbauer L
HMGI/Y proteins: flexible regulators of
transcription and chromatin structure. Biochim. Biophys. Acta
2001;1519:13-29.
49. Reeves R
Molecular biology of HMGA proteins: hubs
of nuclear function. Gene 2001;277:63-81.
50. Reeves R, Nissen MS
The A.T-DNA-binding domain of mammalian
high mobility group I chromosomal proteins. A novel peptide
motif for recognizing DNA structure. J.
Biol. Chem. 1990;265:8573-8582.
51. Harrer M, Luhrs H, Bustin M, Scheer
U, Hock R
Dynamic interaction of HMGA1a proteins
with chromatin. J. Cell Sci. 2004;117:3459-3471.
52. Reeves R, Elton TS, Nissen MS, Lehn D, Johnson KR
Post-transcriptional gene regulation and
specific binding of the nonhistone protein HMG-I by the 3?
untranslated region of bovine interleukin
2 cDNA. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 1987;84:6531-6535.
53. Reeves R, Leonard WJ, Nissen MS
Binding of HMG-I(Y) imparts architectural
specificity to a positioned nucleosome on the promoter of the
human interleukin-2 receptor alpha gene.
Mol. Cell. Biol. 2000;20:4666-4679.
54. Gerlitz G, Hock R, Ueda T, Bustin M
The dynamics of HMG protein-chromatin
interactions in living cells. Biochem. Cell. Biol. 2009;87:127-137.
55. Lerner MR, Andrews NC, Miller G, Steitz JA
Two small RNAs encoded by Epstein-Barr
virus and complexed with protein are precipitated by antibodies
from patients with systemic lupus erythematosus.
Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 1981;78:805-809.
56. Dumpelmann E, Mittendorf H, Benecke BJ
Efficient transcription of the EBER2
gene depends on the structural integrity of the RNA. RNA
2003;9:432-442.
57. Chiappetta G, Avantaggiato V, Visconti R, Fedele M, Battista
S, Trapasso F, Merciai BM, Fidanza V,
Giancotti V, Santoro
M, et al
High level expression of the
HMGI (Y) gene during embryonic development. Oncogene 1996;13:2439-2446.
58. Chiappetta G, Bandiera A, Berlingieri MT, Visconti R,
Manfioletti G, Battista S, Martinez-Tello FJ,
Santoro M, Giancotti
V, Fusco A
The expression of the high mobility group
HMGI (Y) proteins correlates with the malignant phenotype of
human thyroid neoplasias. Oncogene 1995;10:1307-1314.
59. Cleynen I, Van de Ven WJ
The HMGA proteins: a myriad of functions
(Review). Int. J. Oncol. 2008;32:289-305.
60. Fusco A, Fedele M
Roles of HMGA proteins in cancer. Nat.
Rev. Cancer 2007;7:899-910.
61. Hess JL
Chromosomal translocations in benign tumors:
the HMGI proteins. Am J. Clin. Pathol. 1998;109:251-261.
62. Abdulkadir SA, Krishna S, Thanos D, Maniatis T, Strominger
JL, Ono SJ
Functional roles of the transcription factor
Oct-2A and the high mobility group protein I/Y in HLA-DRA
gene expression. J. Exp. Med. 1995;182:487-500.
63. Bonnefoy E, Bandu MT, Doly J
Specific binding of high-mobility-group
I (HMGI) protein and histone H1 to the upstream AT-rich region of
the murine beta interferon promoter: HMGI
protein acts as a potential antirepressor of the promoter. Mol.
Cell. Biol. 1999;19:2803-2816.
64. Ji YS, Xu Q, Schmedtje JF Jr.
Hypoxia induces high-mobility-group protein
I(Y) and transcription of the cyclooxygenase-2 gene in human
vascular endothelium. Circ Res. 1998;83:295-304.
65. Martinez Hoyos J, Fedele M, Battista S, Pentimalli F,
Kruhoffer M, Arra C, Orntoft TF, Croce CM, Fusco A
Identification of the genes up- and down-regulated
by the high mobility group A1 (HMGA1) proteins: tissue
specificity of the HMGA1-dependent gene
regulation. Cancer Res. 2004;64:5728-5735.
66.Barboric M, Yik JH, Czudnochowski N, Yang Z, Chen R, Contreras
X, Geyer M, Matija, Peterlin B, Zhou Q
Tat competes with HEXIM1 to increase the
active pool of P-TEFb for HIV-1 transcription. Nucleic Acids
Res. 2007;35:2003-2012.
67. Sedore SC, Byers SA, Biglione S, Price JP, Maury WJ,
Price DH
Manipulation of P-TEFb control machinery
by HIV: recruitment of P-TEFb from the large form by Tat and
binding of HEXIM1 to TAR. Nucleic Acids
Res. 2007;35:4347-4358.
68. Wang Y, Liu XY, De Clercq E
Role of the HIV-1 positive elongation factor
P-TEFb and inhibitors thereof. Mini. Rev. Med. Chem.
2009;9:379-385.
69. Yik JH, Chen R, Pezda AC, Samford CS, Zhou Q
A human immunodeficiency virus type 1 Tat-like
arginine-rich RNA-binding domain is essential for HEXIM1
to inhibit RNA Polymerase II transcription
through 7SK snRNA-mediated inactivation of P-TEFb. Mol. Cell.
Biol. 2004;24:5094-5105.
70. Cadogan M, Dalgleish AG
HIV induced AIDS and related cancers: chronic
immune activation and future therapeutic strategies. Adv
Cancer Res. 2008;101:349-395.
71. Carbone A, Gloghini A
AIDS-related lymphomas: from pathogenesis
to pathology. Br. J. Haematol. 2005;130:662-670.
72. Greene W, Kuhne K, Ye F, Chen J, Zhou F, Lei X, Gao SJ
Molecular biology of KSHV in relation to
AIDS-associated oncogenesis. Cancer Treat Res.
2007;133:69-127.
73. Martellotta F, Berretta M, Vaccher E, Schioppa O, Zanet
E, Tirelli U
AIDS-related Kaposi's sarcoma: state of
the art and therapeutic strategies. Curr. HIV Res. 2009;7:634-638.
74. Valadkhan S
snRNAs as the catalysts of pre-mRNA splicing.
Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2005;9:603-608.
75. Kenneth NS, White RJ
Regulation by c-Myc of ncRNA expression.
Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 2009;19:38-43.
76. Luo Y, Kurz J, MacAfee N, Krause MO
C-myc deregulation during transformation
induction: involvement of 7SK RNA. J.
Cell. Biochem.
1997;4:313-327.
77. Manabe T, Katayama T, Tohyama M
HMGA1a recognition candidate DNA sequences
in humans. PLoS ONE 2009;4:e8004.
This integrative study reveals that a non-coding RNA, 7SK, interacts
with the human nuclear protein HMG, controlling the activity of HMGA1 as
a gene regulator. The HMG family of high-mobility nuclear proteins are
known de-repressors of condensed, repressed heterochromatin, and HMGA1
is required during much of embryonic life and within many embryoma neoplasms.
The mechanism of action of HMG utilizes the strong polyanionic charcter
of this soluble nuclear protein against the strong polycationic
character of nuclear histones, thus freeing the DNA template for selective
gene transcription.
Additional References:
1. Belton AM, Iacobuzio-Donahue C, Colletti EJ, Almeida-Porada GD,
Huso DL, and Resar L,
"HMGA1 drives expansion
of the intestinal stem cell compartment in transgenic mice and tumor progression
in colon cancer cells".
2. Resar LMS,
"The High
Mobility Group A1 Gene: Transforming Inflammatory Signals into Cancer?".
3. Frenster JH,
"Nuclear Polyanions
as De-Repressors of Synthesis of Ribonucleic Acid."
4.. Luo Y, Kurz J, MacAfee N, and Krause MO,
"C-myc de-regulation
during transformation induction: involvement of 7SK RNA".
1. Each cell retains all of its embryonic genes for a lifetime.
2. Controls for embryonic genes are often absent in adults.
3. Uncontrolled embryonic genes can replicate wildly.
4. Replicating genes participate in intra-cellular competition.
5. The basis for gene competition is selective transcription.
6. MicroRNAs can reprogram embryomic transcription.
7. Gene reprogramming can produce normal phenotypes.
8. Normal phenotypes can by-pass chromosomal lesions.
9. MicroRNA therapy may need to be permanent.
10. Transplantation of microRNAs could be preferred.
1. Pathways within cell genomes involve a flow of information.
2. Information can flow by direct contact or by third parties.
3. Direct contact within whole genomes is difficult to regulate.
4. DNA-DNA direct contects are influenced by agents.
5. Nuclear agents include hydrophilic ionic and hydrophobic conforming ligands.
6. Third parties within genomes involve RNAs and proteins.
7. RNAs and proteins are easy to regulate or reverse.
8. Information can be shared, lost, or transformed.
9. System information can be hidden during system isolation.
10. Local information can be permanently lost during system entropy.
http://www.cancerbiophysics.net/
Links to Current
Research in Euchromatin:
Links to
Euchromatin Activator RNA Reviews:
Links to
Euchromatin Activator RNA Research:
Links to Ultrastructural
Probes of DNase I-Sensitive Sites:
Links to
RNA as a Therapeutic Agent:
Links to Hodgkin Lymphoma
Immuno-Pathology:
Links to Activated
T-Lymphocyte Immunotherapy:
Links to Medical
Systems Biology:
Links to Selective
Gene Transcription:
Links to RNA-Induced
Epigenetics:
Links to RNA-Induced
Embryogenesis:
Links to RNA and
Biological Causality:
Links to Reprogramming
and Neoplasia:
A Brief History of Activator RNA:
"Ultrastructural
Probes of Active DNA Sites, and the RNA Activators of DNA".
(PowerPoint Presentation).
Top of Page - Euchromatin
Network - Euchromatin
Research - Research
in Quantitative Radiology
For Further Information and Feedback:
Jeannette A. Hovsepian, M.D.
E-mail: frensasc@ix.netcom.com
Phone: +1 650 367 6483