Published OnlineFirst August 4, 2011;
doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-11-0291
Cancer Research,  October 1, 2011   v. 71;  no. 19, pp. 6132-42
http://cancerres.aacrjournals.org/content/71/19/6132.abstract

Received January 25, 2011.  Revision received July 29, 2011.  Accepted July 30, 2011.


"FLT3 Ligand Enhances the Cancer Therapeutic Potency of Naked RNA Vaccines".

Sebastian Kreiter 1,  Mustafa Diken 1,  Abderraouf Selmi 1, 2,  Jan Diekmann 1,  Sebastian Attig 2,  Yves Hüsemann 1,  Michael Koslowski 1,  Christoph Huber 1,  Özlem Türeci 4,  and Ugur Sahin 1, 2, 3, @

1 Institute for Translational Oncology and Immunology (TRON);
2 Department of Internal Medicine III, Division of Translational and Experimental Oncology, Johannes Gutenberg University;
3 Ribological, Biontech AG;
4 Ganymed Pharmaceuticals AG, Mainz, Germany

@Corresponding Author:

      Ugur Sahin, Institute for Translational Oncology and Immunology (TRON), Translational and Experimental Oncology, Johannes Gutenberg University, Langenbeckstr. 1, 55131 Mainz, Germany. Phone: 49-6131-178011; Fax: 49-6131-178059; E-mail: sahin@uni-mainz.de

*S. Kreiter, M. Diken, and A. Selmi contributed equally to the first authorship.



NetworkEditors' Perspectives: "RNA and adjuvants for antigen-specific cancer immunotherapy in mice".
Abstract:
Introduction:
Supplementary Data:
Material and Methods:
Results: FLT3 ligand treatment expands DCs and NK cells in the lymph node and spleen.
   Figure 1. FLT3 ligand treatment expands DC populations and NK cells in lymph nodes and spleen.
   Figure 2. FLT3 ligand and RNA vaccination synergize in induction of a Th1-favoring lymph node milieu.
   Figure 3. FLT3 ligand acts as adjuvant for intra-nodal RNA vaccination via its effect on pDCs.
   Figure 4. FLT3 ligand boosts antitumor immunity of intra-nodal RNA vaccines.
Discussion:
Summary:
Acknowledgments:
Footnotes:
References:
Additional References:
Conclusions from: Euchromatin, Embryomas, Entropy, Enhancers, and EMT.
Further Topics:
Definitions:
 




Abstract:

Intra-nodal immunization with antigen-encoding naked RNA may offer a simple and safe approach to induce antitumor immunity. RNA taken up by nodal dendritic cells (DC) co-activates toll-like receptor (TLR) signaling that will prime and expand antigen-specific T cells. In this study, we show that RNA vaccination can be optimized by co-administration of the DC-activating Fms-like tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3) ligand as an effective adjuvant. Systemic administration of FLT3 ligand prior to immunization enhanced priming and expansion of antigen-specific CD8+ T cells in lymphoid organs, T-cell homing into melanoma tumors, and therapeutic activity of the intra-nodal RNA. Unexpectedly, plasmacytoid DCs (pDC) were found to be essential for the adjuvant effect of FLT3 ligand and they were systemically expanded together with conventional DCs after treatment. In response to FLT3 ligand, pDCs maintained an immature phenotype, internalized RNA, and presented the RNA-encoded antigen for efficient induction of antigen-specific CD8+ T-cell responses. Co-administration of FLT3 ligand with RNA vaccination achieved remarkable cure rates and survival of mice with advanced melanoma. Our findings show how to improve the simple and safe strategy offered by RNA vaccines for cancer immunotherapy.




Supplementary data for this article are available at :
http://cancerres.aacrjournals.org/content/71/19/6132/suppl/DC1




Introduction:

Direct application of naked antigen-encoding RNA is for more than one decade under active investigation as a vaccine approach against cancer (1). Compared with DNA, RNA immunization lacks the risk of integration into the genome and due to transient expression of the encoded antigens allows better control of immune responses. In contrast to viral recombinant vectors, RNA does not feature immunodominant viral antigens that interfere with the preferred antigen-specific immune response. Moreover, RNA-based compounds not only deliver the complete antigen but also have an intrinsic adjuvant activity. Recombinant RNA is easy to produce by in vitro transcription in large amounts and high purity. The capability of RNA vaccines to confer antitumor immunity has been shown in model systems (2–6) and promising results of early clinical testing have been reported recently (7–9).

A few years ago, we developed a strategy to generate pharmacologically optimized RNA with improved stability, translational performance, and presentation of the encoded antigen on MHC class I and II molecules (4,10, 11). Injection of such optimized RNA into lymph nodes is superior to any other application route with regard to induction of potent antigen-specific T-cell immunity (5). The RNA propagates a pro-inflammatory microenvironment in the lymph node, resulting in de novo priming and efficient expansion of antigen-specific CD8+ and CD4+ T cells (5). By immunizing tumor-bearing mice with this RNA vaccine, we achieved potent antitumor immunity and remarkable survival benefit (5).

The objective of the current study was to further augment the potency of intranodally administered RNA by combination with a suitable adjuvant. Adjuvants are compounds that enhance the magnitude, breadth, quality, and longevity of specific immune responses to antigens and have minimal toxicity. For a long time, adjuvant research progressed at a slow pace and adjuvant design was largely empirical. In the meantime, as the development of immuno-therapeutics is gaining speed, the need for rational selection strategies for adjuvant formulations based on sound immunologic principles is becoming evident.

We recently revealed that RNA administered into the lymph node is selectively internalized by resident immature dendritic cells (DC) and that the uptake is highly efficient and is driven by macropinocytosis (12). Both the cell type and the uptake mechanism were shown to be functionally relevant for the observed efficiency of intranodal RNA vaccination. These notions were factored into the rationally guided search for suitable adjuvants. With DCs being essential for vaccine effects of intranodal RNA, we came across Fms-like tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3) ligand (13, 14), a naturally occurring glycoprotein stimulating early hematopoietic progenitors via the FLT3 receptor (15) and mobilizing them from the bone marrow into the peripheral blood and secondary lymphatic organs. FLT3 ligand is known to induce profound expansion of DCs in the peripheral lymphoid organs (16–18), and FLT3 ligand–induced DCs have an immature phenotype (19, 20). However, it is not clear whether these DCs are capable of presenting antigens encoded by RNA. In addition to expansion of DCs, various other effects of FLT3 ligand have been reported, including stimulation of natural killer (NK), B, and T cells (21–24). These effects translated in improved T-cell immunity and antitumor potency in mouse models when FLT3 ligand was used as an adjuvant in vaccination approaches (16–18, 25–27).

In this study, we detail our efforts to evaluate FLT3 ligand in combination with intranodally administered RNA and to dissect the mechanisms underlying the strong synergy of both compounds. Surprisingly, we revealed that plasmacytoid DCs (pDC) are central to the observed adjuvant effects of FLT3 ligand. Our findings not only open new paths for improved RNA vaccination strategies but also give unexpected insights into the functional potency of pDCs.

Materials and Methods:

Animals

C57BL/6 mice were obtained from Jackson Laboratories. TCR transgenic OT-I mice that recognize the H2-Kb-restricted SIINFEKL epitope (OVA257-264-) from chicken ovalbumin and C57BL/6-based IFN-a receptor (IFNAR)-deficient (IFNAR-/-) mice (28) were kindly provided by H.J. Schild (Mainz, Germany) and Paul-Ehrlich Institute (Langen, Germany), respectively. All mice were kept in accordance with federal and state policies on animal research at the University of Mainz.

Cells

B16-F10 melanoma cell line expressing the chicken ovalbumin (OVA) gene (B16-OVA, a gift of U. Hartwig, University of Mainz, Germany) was received in 2008 and subjected to master cell bank generation. Early (third and fourth) passages of cells were used for tumor experiments. Cells were routinely tested for Mycoplasma. Re-authentification of cells has not been done since receipt. FLT3 ligand-conditioned bone marrow–derived DCs (FLT3L-BMDC) were generated by 8-day culture of bone marrow precursors with 200 ng/mL FLT3L-IgG4.

FLT3 ligand plasmid construction and protein purification

A cDNA representing the signal peptide and extracellular domain of human FLT3 ligand (aa 1–185) was cloned into an expression vector and carboxy-terminally fused to a 675-bp fragment coding for the hinge region and heavy chain constant regions 2 and 3 [(CH2 and CH3) of human IgG4], to obtain FLT3L-IgG4. As control, the 675-bp IgG4-Fc fragment (IgG4) was cloned separately in the expression vector. HEK293 cells were transfected with these constructs using polyetylenimine (PEI; Sigma-Aldrich) for production of FLT3L-IgG4 or IgG4 proteins, which subsequently were purified from culture supernatants by affinity chromatography with Mab-Select SuRe columns (GE Healthcare) and stored at -80°C. FLT3L-IgG4 or IgG4 fragments were administered intraperitoneally (i.p.). In some experiments, human IgG4 kappa antibody (Sigma-Aldrich) was used as a control.

RNA vaccines, in vitro transcription, and intranodal immunization

All plasmids for in vitro transcription of naked antigen-encoding RNA encoding luciferase (Luc) are based on the pST1-2hBgUTR-A120 backbone (10), which feature a 3' human b-globin untranslated region (hBgUTR) and a poly(A) tail of 120 nucleotides and allow generation of pharmacologically improved in vitro transcribed RNA. The MITD vectors pST1-sec-SIINFEKL-MITD-2hBgUTR-A120 (SIINFEKL; ref. 11) and pST1-sec-Influenza-HA-MITD-2hBgUTR-A120 (HA; ref. 11) allow tagging of the respective protein with a secretion signal (Sec) and the transmembrane and cytosolic domains of the MHC class I (MITD) ensuring efficient presentation on MHC class I and class II. The SIINFEKL construct contains aa 257 to 264 of chicken OVA and the HA construct a codon-optimized partial sequence of influenza HA (aa 60–285 fused to aa 517–527; influenza strain A/PR/8/34) designed to combine major immunodominant MHC epitopes.

In vitro transcription and purification of RNA were previously described (29). HA-RNA was labeled with Cy5-UTP (Cy5-RNA) according to the manufacturer's instructions (Amersham). Purified RNA was assessed by spectrophotometry, gel electrophoresis, and BioAnalyzer (Agilent).

As described previously (5), for intranodal immunization of mice with naked RNA, the inguinal lymph node of anaesthetized mice was surgically exposed, 20 mg RNA in 10 mL RNase-free PBS (Ambion) were injected intranodally, and the wound was closed.

Flow cytometry and tetramer staining

All monoclonal antibodies (mAb) were from BD Pharmingen, except anti-PDCA1 (Miltenyi Biotec). Hypotonically lysed blood and splenocyte samples were incubated at 4°C with mAbs. Lymph node cells were obtained by digestion with collagenase (1 mg/mL; Roche). Direct ex vivo quantification of SIINFEKL-specific CD8+ cells with H-2 Kb/SIINFEKL tetramer (Beckman-Coulter) without in vitro stimulation (10) and intracellular cytokine staining (29) were previously described. Absolute quantification of NK cells in blood was carried out with Trucount tubes (BD Biosciences) by adding 50 mL heparinized blood to the Trucount tube, staining with antibodies against CD45, CD3, and NK1.1, and quantification of cells after lysis of erythrocytes with fluorescence-activated cell-sorting (FACS) lysing solution (BD Biosciences). Regulatory T cells (Treg) were analyzed with the FoxP3 Staining Kit (eBioscience). Conventional DCs (cDC; (CD11c+PDCA1-) and pDCs (CD11c+PDCA1+) were sorted by FACSAria (BD Biosciences). Quantification of H-2 Kb/SIINFEKL complexes by 25-D1.16 antibody was carried out as previously described (10). Flow cytometric data were acquired on a FACSCalibur and FACSCanto analytic flow cytometers (BD Biosciences) and analyzed with FlowJo (Tree Star) software.

In vivo bioluminescence imaging

Uptake and translation of Luc-RNA were evaluated by in vivo bioluminescence imaging (BLI) using the IVIS Lumina imaging system (Caliper Life Sciences; ref. 4). Briefly, an aqueous solution of d-luciferin (150 mg/kg body weight; BD Biosciences) was injected intraperitoneally 24 hours after administration of Luc-RNA. After 15 minutes, emitted photons were quantified (integration time of 1 minute). In vivo bioluminescence in regions of interest (ROI) were quantified as total flux (photons per seconds) using IVIS Living Image 3.0 Software.

Quantitative real time PCR

Extraction of total cellular RNA, first-strand cDNA synthesis, real-time PCR (RT-PCR) using TaqMan Gene Expression Assays (Applied Biosystems), and normalization to the housekeeping gene Hprt1 were described previously (30).

Tumor experiments

Tumor vaccination protocols were previously described (5). Briefly, 2 × 105 B16-OVA melanoma cells were inoculated subcutaneously into the flanks of C57BL/6 mice. FLT3L-IgG4 (10 mg) or human IgG4 control antibody were administered intraperitoneally on day 3, day 7, day 14, and day 18 after tumor inoculation. Four intranodal immunizations of SIINFEKL-RNA (20 mg) in 3- to 4-day intervals were initiated 11 days after tumor cell inoculation (diameter of tumors 2 mm). The tumor sizes were measured every 3 days. Mice were sacrificed when tumor diameter reached 15 mm.

Tumor-infiltrating cells (TIC) were obtained by mechanical disruption of the tumor tissue and phenotyping:

myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSC; CD11b+, Gr1+), Tregs (CD4+, CD25+FoxP3+), NK cells (NK1.1+, CD3-), B cells (CD19+, CD3-), SIINFEKL+ CD8+ T cells (CD3+, CD8+, tetramer+), CD8+ T cells (CD3+, CD8+, CD4-), CD4+ T cells (CD3+, CD4+CD8-), pDC (CD11c+, PDCA1+, NK1.1-), and cDC (CD11c+, PDCA1-, NK1.1-).

In vivo depletion of pDCs

C57BL/6 mice received 500 mg of anti-PDCA1 (Miltenyi Biotec) mAb or a monoclonal rat IgG1 mAb (Jackson ImmunoResearch) as a control 2 times in 6-day intervals.

Enzyme-linked immunospot assay

Enzyme-linked immunospot (ELISPOT) assay was carried out as described before (5). Briefly, 1 × 104 cDCs or pDCs sorted from SIINFEKL-RNA or control RNA (HA-RNA) electroporated FLT3L-BMDCs were coincubated with 1 × 105 magnetic-associated cell-sorted CD8+ OT-I T cells in a microtiter plate coated with anti-IFN-g antibody (10 mg/mL, clone AN18; Mabtech). After 18 hours at 37°C, cytokine secretion was detected with an anti-IFN-g antibody (clone R4-6A2; Mabtech).

Immunohistochemistry and immunofluorescence

Cryosections (4–6 mm) from mouse lymph nodes were fixed with cold acetone and blocked with PBS-containing 5% mouse serum.

For indirect staining, rat-anti-PDCA1 (Jfig5-1C2.4.1; Miltenyi), rat-anti-F4/80 (BM8; eBioscience) or rat-anti-NK1.1 (PK136; BD Biosciences) as primary antibodies were combined with Cy3-anti-rat-IgG (N418; Molecular Probes). For direct staining, reticular fibroblasts and fibers were visualized with Alexa488-anti-ER-TR7 (BMA), sections were mounted in Vectashield mounting medium (VECTORLabs), analyzed with a Zeiss immunofluorecence microscope (Carl Zeiss MicroImaging GmbH), and digital images were prepared using Photoshop CS4 (Adobe).

Statistics

GraphPad Prism software using unpaired 2-tailed Student's t test or ANOVA with Tukey's multiple comparison test was used. Differences in survival were analyzed by the log-rank test. Values of  P < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results:

FLT3 ligand treatment expands DCs and NK cells in the lymph node and spleen

In an attempt to test compounds expanding the DC population in combination with intranodal RNA, we came across FLT3 ligand. As the half-life of FLT3 ligand in serum is very short (31), we engineered a recombinant fusion protein (Fig. 1A) linking the extracellular domain of human FLT3 ligand to the heavy chain constant regions 2 and 3 (CH2-CH3 domain) of human IgG4 to increase the serum half-life (data not shown). It was already shown that human FLT3 ligand can cross-react with mouse FLT3 (32), which enabled the use of human FLT3 ligand in the murine setting. Two intraperitoneal applications of this FLT3 ligand IgG4 fusion protein (referred to as FLT3L-IgG4) resulted in significant increase of cellularity in lymph nodes and spleen as compared with controls [PBS or the IgG4-Fc protein fragment lacking the FLT3 ligand moiety (referred to as IgG4; Fig. 1B; Supplementary Fig. S1A)]. As DCs resident in lymphoid organs are of major relevance for the mechanism of action of intranodally administered RNA, we analyzed these cells in more detail. Subpopulations of cDCs and pDCs were profoundly expanded in both compartments of FLT3 ligand–treated mice as compared with controls (Fig. 1C; Supplementary Fig. S1B). As revealed in lymph node sections, pDCs accumulated in the T-cell zones (Fig. 1D). Noteworthy, neither lymph node cDCs nor pDCs of FLT3 ligand–treated mice showed molecular signs of maturation (Fig. 1E). 




Figure 1. FLT3 ligand treatment results in expansion of DC populations and NK cells in lymph nodes and spleen.

Figure 1. FLT3 ligand treatment results in expansion of DC populations and NK cells in lymph nodes and spleen.

A, structure of the human FLT3 ligand IgG4-Fc fusion protein (Flt3L-IgG4).

B–E, C57BL/6 mice (n = 3–5) received 2 intraperitoneal injections of Flt3L-IgG4 (10 mg; day 0 and day 3) or PBS (control) in 4 independent experiments and were subjected to analysis on day 10.

B, cellularity was assessed in lymph node and spleen.

C, DC subpopulations were quantified both in lymph node (left) and in spleen (right).

D, fluorescence microscopy of inguinal lymph nodes was carried out for visualization of pDCs (PDCA1), NK cells (NK1.1), macrophages (F4/80), and reticular fibroblasts (ER-TR7). Scale bars, 100 mm.

E, activation status of cDCs (CD11c+PDCA-) and pDCs (CD11c+PDCA+) was assessed by flow cytometry.

F, absolute numbers of NK cells (NK1.1+CD3-) were determined by flow cytometry after Flt3L-IgG4 application (as in Fig. 1B). Data (mean ± SEM) are from 1 of 4 (B, C, E, and F) independent experiments with similar results. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01 [Student's t test (B, C, E, and F)]. 


As described recently (22, 33), CD3?NK1.1+ NK cells were significantly expanded in lymph nodes and spleen of mice treated with FLT3 ligand (Fig. 1D and F) and were most prominent around day 7 in blood (Supplementary Fig. S2). In line with reports on FLT3 ligand application in rats (34), we found no expansion of macrophages in mice (Fig. 1D).

FLT3 ligand and intranodal RNA vaccination synergize in inducing a Th1 lymph node milieu and in activation of DCs and NK cells

Next, we investigated the fate and effects of intranodally injected RNA when combined with FLT3 ligand as adjuvant. We found that Cy5-labeled HA-RNA injected into lymph nodes of mice preconditioned with 2 treatment cycles of FLT3 ligand was internalized by both pDCs and cDCs with high efficiency (Fig. 2A). Moreover, as shown by in vivo BLI, translation of Luc-RNA injected into lymph nodes of these mice was comparable with that of control mice (Fig. 2B).

Figure 2. FLT3 ligand and intranodal RNA vaccination synergize in induction of a Th1-favoring lymph node milieu and activation of DCs and NK cells.

Figure 2. FLT3 ligand and intranodal RNA vaccination synergize in induction of a Th1-favoring lymph node milieu and activation of DCs and NK cells.

C57BL/6 mice (n = 3–12) were treated with 2 cycles of Flt3L-IgG4 (10 mg i.p., day 0 and day 3) followed by intranodal vaccination with RNA (20 mg; day 7; HA-RNA, if not indicated otherwise) or control (in vitro transcription reaction mixture lacking RNA polymerase) in several independent experiments. If not indicated otherwise, analysis was done 24 hours after RNA injection.

A, HA-RNA administered intranodally to Flt3L-IgG4–treated C57BL/6 mice (n = 4) was Cy5-labeled (Cy5-nucleotides as control). One hour after RNA injection, uptake in DCs was quantified.

B, Luc-RNA (20 mg) was injected into lymph nodes of C57BL/6 mice (n = 8), and BLI was carried out 24 hours later (left; red lines, mean values). A representative image is shown (right).

C, maturation markers of pDCs from inguinal lymph nodes were analyzed by flow cytometry.

D, 20 hours after vaccination, frequencies of IL-12–secreting pDCs (CD11c+PDCA1+) and cDC (CD11c+PDCA1-) in injected lymph nodes were quantified by intracellular cytokine staining after in vitro culture for 6 hours in the presence of brefeldin A (BFA) to allow intracellular cytokine accumulation before staining. Representative dot plots (left) show gating strategy and percentage of IL-12+ DC subpopulations (right). The bar chart shows the absolute number of IL-12–secreting DCs per lymph node.

E, quantitative RT-PCR analysis of immunomodulatory molecules expressed on DC subpopulations sorted from pooled inguinal lymph nodes of treated and control mice (n = 2 × 12) 8 hours after intranodal injection of HA-RNA. Bars indicate fold change in expression level compared with respective controls.

F, the frequency (left) and absolute number (right) as well as (G) the activation status of NK cells in the inguinal lymph node were analyzed. Data (mean ± SEM; C, D, and F) are each representative for 2 independent experiments with similar results. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001 [Student's t test (B, C, D, and F)].


Most interestingly, when FLT3 ligand–treated mice received RNA intranodally, maturation of pDCs was induced as documented by increase of markers CD80, CD86, CD40, and MHC II (Fig. 2C). This is in analogy to what we recently reported for cDCs consecutively to intranodal RNA administration (5). DCs started secretion of high levels of interleukin (IL)-12 (Fig. 2D, left). Most interestingly, pDCs were preferentially expanded and activated by RNA so that their absolute number per lymph node surpassed that of cDCs (Fig. 2D, right). Expression profiling of pDCs and cDCs from lymph nodes by quantitative RT-PCR revealed profound alteration of the lymph node microenvironment of mice receiving the combination of FLT3 ligand and RNA as compared with mice receiving FLT3 ligand alone (Fig. 2E). NK cells and Th1 lymphocytes attracting chemokines CXCL10 (IP10) and CXCL9 (35, 36) were induced up to 2 logs. IL-6, which supports expansion and survival of primed T cells (37) and CD40 receptor, a key mediator of DC activation by CD4+ T cells, were upregulated, the latter particularly in pDCs. DC recruiting chemokines CCL3 (MIP-1a) and CCL4 (38) were modestly elevated, whereas IFN-a expression did not change.

Intranodal administration of naked RNA to FLT3 ligand–treated mice also had a major impact on NK cells. The frequency and absolute number of lymph node NK cells (Fig. 2F) as well as their intracellular IFN-g levels (Supplementary Fig. S3A) increased significantly and they exhibited an activated CD69+ phenotype (Fig. 2G). Moreover, absolute number and frequency of lymph node NK cells secreting high amounts of IFN-g, when treated with PMA in vitro, were clearly higher in RNA treated group (Supplementary Fig. S3B), showing enhanced susceptibility of NK cells for inflammatory stimuli.

These findings underline that the combination of FLT3 ligand and intranodal RNA administration induces an inflammatory Th1 milieu, favorable for the efficient priming and expansion of antigen-specific T cells, and leads to functional activation of both antigen presenters as well as NK cells, thus integrating all factors required for an efficient immune response.

pDCs are essential for augmentation of RNA-induced antigen-specific T-cell response by FLT3 ligand preconditioning

We then characterized T-cell responses induced by combining FLT3 ligand with intranodal RNA vaccination. Mice received FLT3 ligand at day 0 and day 3 followed by intranodal SIINFEKL-RNA immunization at day 7 and day 10. Frequencies of SIINFEKL-specific CD8+ T cells measured 5 days after the last immunization were profoundly increased in blood, spleen, and lymph nodes of FLT3 ligand preconditioned mice (Fig. 3A), and these cells secreted IFN-g upon antigen encounter (Supplementary Fig. S4). To determine the relevance of pDCs for the observed adjuvant effect, pDC-depleting antibody anti-PDCA1 was administered to mice preconditioned with FLT3 ligand prior to immunization with SIINFEKL-RNA, resulting in reduction of the pDC subpopulation in the lymph node to half of normal levels and nearly complete abrogation in the spleen (Fig. 3B), whereas cDC and NK cell numbers were not altered (data not shown). Frequencies of SIINFEKL-specific CD8+ T cells achieved by the combination of FLT3 ligand and intranodal SIINFEKL-RNA administration were significantly lower in pDC-depleted mice than in mice with normal pDC frequencies (Fig. 3C). pDC-depleted mice treated with FLT3 ligand and SIINFEKL-RNA had T-cell frequencies comparable with those of mice that were immunized with SIINFEKL-RNA alone, suggesting that the increment in T-cell response achieved by FLT3 ligand preconditioning is significantly mediated by pDCs.

Figure 3. FLT3 ligand acts as adjuvant for intranodal RNA vaccination via its effect on pDCs.

Figure 3. FLT3 ligand acts as adjuvant for intranodal RNA vaccination via its effect on pDCs.

A, C57BL/6 mice (n = 4–5) received either Flt3L-IgG4 (10 mg; day 0 and day 3) or PBS (control) intraperitoneally, followed by 2 intranodal immunizations (day 7 and day 10) with SIINFEKL-RNA (20 mg) in several independent experiments. SIINFEKL-specific CD8+ T cells were quantified in different compartments by tetramer staining carried out ex vivo (left). Bar chart shows data (mean ± SEM) from 2 independent experiments. Representative dot plots show the percentage of SIINFEKL-specific CD8+ T cells in all CD8+ cells 5 days after the last immunization (right).

B and C, mice were treated as described above. After Flt3L-IgG4 preconditioning, mice received anti-PDCA1 antibody (500 mg i.p.) or a control antibody (rat-IgG1) 1 day prior to each immunization at day 6 and day 9.

B, dot plots provide percentages of pDCs within all CD11c+ DCs in lymph nodes and spleen.

C, percentages (mean ± SEM) of SIINFEKL-specific T cells within the CD8+ population in different treatment groups were determined by tetramer staining.

D, BMDCs generated with Flt3L-IgG4 (Flt3L-BMDCs) were eletroporated with either SIINFEKL-RNA (30 mg) or HA-RNA (30 mg) as control together with eGFP-RNA (10 mg). Surface densities of SIINFEKL/H2-Kb complexes on eGFP+ cDCs and pDCs were assessed after 18 hours by flow cytometry with the 25-D1.16 antibody. Numbers in parentheses represent mean fluorescence intensity of 25-D1.16. Data are representative for 2 independent experiments.

E, Flt3L-BMDCs electroporated with either SIINFEKL-RNA (30 mg) or HA-RNA (30 mg) as control were sorted into cDCs and pDCs (1 × 104), which were then coincubated with CD8+ OT-I T cells (1 × 105) and SIINFEKL-specific CD8 T-cell response (mean ± SEM) was analyzed in an IFN-g ELISPOT assay 18 hours later.

F, IFNAR-/- mice (n = 4) received either Flt3L-IgG4 (10 mg; day 0 and day 3) or PBS (control) intraperitoneally, followed by 2 intranodal immunizations (day 7 and day 10) with SIINFEKL-RNA (20 mg). Percentages (mean ± SEM) of SIINFEKL-specific CD8+ T cells were quantified in blood by tetramer staining 5 days after the last immunization. *, P < 0.05; ***, P < 0.001 [Student's t test (A, E, and F); ANOVA with Tukey's multiple comparison test (C)]. 


To elucidate the mechanism by which pDCs mediate the FLT3 ligand adjuvant effect, we first tested their capability to act as antigen presenters. BMDCs were differentiated in vitro in FLT3 ligand–supplemented medium that resulted in a mixed population of cDCs and pDCs (FLT3L-BMDCs). FLT3L-BMDCs were transfected with SIINFEKL- or control-RNA, and SIINFEKL peptide/MHC molecule complexes were quantified with the 25-D1.16 antibody (Fig. 3D). Most interestingly, we found efficient processing and presentation of the peptide by pDCs (factor 3.0 vs. 3.7 as compared with cDCs). When these peptide-presenting cDCs and pDCs were sorted and tested in ELISPOT for recognition by TCR transgenic OT-I CD8+ T cells (Fig. 3E), pDCs strongly induced IFN-g secretion, indicating their capability to act as efficient antigen-presenting cells.

To investigate whether IFN-a secretion, one of the most prominent constitutive functions of pDCs, plays a role in the adjuvant effect of FLT3 ligand, we treated IFNAR-/- mice with FLT3 ligand or PBS as control followed by vaccination with SIINFEKL-RNA. The increased frequency of SIINFEKL-specific CD8+ T cells in FLT3 ligand–treated mice compared with control mice showed that IFN-a secretion is not key for the FLT3 ligand adjuvant effect (Fig 3F).

FLT3 ligand improves antitumoral therapeutic immunity mediated by intranodal RNA vaccination

Next, we wanted to know whether the profound therapeutic benefit of intranodal RNA immunization in animal models can be topped by the addition of FLT3 ligand. For an advanced B16-OVA melanoma model, tumor cells were inoculated (day 0) and mice were conditioned with 4 administrations of FLT3 ligand. Tumors were grown to macroscopic visibility, and 4 cycles of SIINFEKL-RNA vaccination were initiated 11 days after tumor inoculation (Fig. 4A). As single agents, intranodal RNA immunization cured only 30% of mice and FLT3 ligand alone had a very moderate effect on survival. By combining the RNA vaccine and FLT3 ligand, however, 70% of the treated mice were cured from their cancer and survived or became tumor-free. When we characterized the TICs in the treatment groups, we found significant differences. Although FLT3 ligand as single agent did not alter the composition of immune cell infiltrations in the tumor nodule, intranodal administration of SIINFEKL-RNA alone expanded nearly all tested subpopulations, in particular of pDCs, cDCs, NK cells, T cells, MDSCs, and Tregs (Fig. 4B). The combination of both agents had a minor incremental effect on cellularity as compared with RNA alone. Interestingly, the percentage of antigen-specific CD8+ T cells was profoundly increased (Fig. 4B). As a consequence, in animals treated with the combination, Tregs were outnumbered by cytotoxic antigen-specific CD8+ effector T cells (Fig. 4C).

Figure 4. FLT3 ligand boosts antitumor immunity of intranodal RNA vaccines.


 

Figure 4. FLT3 ligand boosts antitumor immunity of intranodal RNA vaccines.

A–C, B16 OVA tumor cells (2 × 105) were inoculated subcutaneously into the flanks of C57BL/6 mice (n = 10). When tumors reached diameters of 2 to 3 mm, mice were preconditioned with intraperitoneally administered Flt3L-IgG4 or IgG4 (control; 10 mg; day 3, day 7, day 14, and day 17) combined with 4 cycles of intranodal immunization with SIINFEKL-RNA (20 mg; day 11, day 14, day 17, day 24).

A, survival was visualized in the Kaplan–Meier plot [control + RNA vs. Flt3L-IgG4 + RNA, P = 0.028 (log-rank test)].

B, on day 25, tumors were harvested and TICs were analyzed for each group. Percentage of each subpopulation in the bulk cell population harvested from tumor nodules is provided.

C, the ratio of intratumoral SIINFEKL-specific CD8 T cells in relation to Tregs. Data are shown as mean ± SEM (B and C). *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01 [ANOVA with Tukey's multiple comparison test (B); Student's t test (C)]. 


In summary, these data imply that FLT3 ligand preconditioning further improves the survival benefit achieved by intranodal vaccination with antigen-encoding RNA and that this is associated with an increase of antigen-specific cytotoxic T cells infiltrating the tumor lesion.

Discussion:

The use of antigen-encoding RNA for cancer vaccination confers several advantages. These can be fully exploited when RNA is administered intranodally and unfolds its dual potential as a template for efficient translation as well as immunostimulatory ligand for Toll-like receptors (TLR).

This study was undertaken to evaluate FLT3 ligand as a systemic adjuvant in conjunction with intranodal RNA vaccination. This report shows for the first time that FLT3 ligand potentiates immunogenicity of intranodal RNA vaccination. We reveal that several mechanisms contribute to this synergy.

First, FLT3 ligand expands DC and NK populations in different compartments including the lymph node and thus mobilizes beforehand a higher number of antigen presenters and effectors to the site the antigen will be delivered to. Our findings verify our primary hypothesis that the number of antigen presenters in the lymph node may be rate limiting for efficacy of RNA vaccines and should be considered when selecting candidate compounds to combine with RNA. Surprisingly, we found that within the DC population, pDCs have the most dominant impact on the magnitude of induced immune responses and that in pDC-depleted mice adjuvant effects of FLT3 ligand are abrogated. According to our data, this can be attributed to the fact that in combination with antigen-encoding RNA, pDCs act as efficient antigen presenters, which is in analogy to effects of RNA on cDCs (5). As we show for the first time, pDCs are able to efficiently internalize RNA, are thereby activated to secrete IL-12, and process as well as present the encoded antigen with high efficiency.

Another mechanism is that FLT3 ligand not as single agent but together with RNA activates both cell types to develop a phenotype optimal for their cross-talk and further augments the Th1-skewing effect of RNA resulting in a pronounced proinflammatory lymph node microenvironment.

Moreover, in accordance with previous studies (19, 20), we show that systemic FLT3 ligand administration does not lead to DC maturation; hence, FLT3 ligand–expanded DCs retain their immature phenotype, thereby enabling efficient internalization of vaccine RNA by immature DCs. Many adjuvants mediate maturation of antigen-presenting cells and this effect is associated with efficient induction of sustained immune responses and therefore highly desired. It is already known that macropinocytic activity of DCs is abolished by maturation stimuli (39, 40). Accordingly, we previously observed that preincubation of DCs with maturation-inducing adjuvants such as LPS, CD40L, or dsRNA abrogated the capability of DCs to engulf RNA (12). The concomitant impairment of macropinocytosis is less relevant for extracellularly stable vaccine formats (e.g., protein or DNA-based vaccines). For RNA vaccines, in contrast, which have a short extracellular half-life, antigen salvage into DCs by macropinocytosis is a critical requirement.

In summary, these mechanisms result in a significantly higher frequency of antigen-specific T cells in the periphery and in tumor lesions of B16 melanoma. Higher CD8/Treg ratios within tumors are reached, which are known to be indicative for effective vaccination and in fact result in a compelling cure rate in mice suffering from advanced B16 melanoma (41, 42).

These observations imply that an adjuvant should be chosen on the basis of complementarity of its mode of action with that of the vaccine format it will be combined with. The superior immunopharmaceutical performance of RNA administered intranodally depends on its selective uptake via immature DCs and creation of a Th1-type microenvironment. These prerequisites are easy to meet for FLT3 ligand, as it does not counteract, but rather enhances these 2 advantageous features.

Our data also convey a better understanding of adjuvant features of FLT3 ligand. It is known that daily FLT3 ligand injections alter cellular composition in blood and secondary lymphatic organs of mice including induction of a marked DC hyperplasia (16–18). In contrast to the reported regimens based usually on administering 10 to 20 mg FLT3 ligand for 7 to 9 days (18, 43), we achieved even superior antitumoral effects in vivo with only 2 injections of 10 mg (day 0 and day 3) most likely owing to the high cooperative complementarity of naked RNA and FLT3 ligand. Most interestingly, among the different vaccine formats with which FLT3 ligand have been combined in the past, DNA vaccines have yielded the best results (27, 44, 45). Neither uptake mechanisms of DNA  vaccines nor the reason for synergizing with FLT3 ligand is known, but it is well conceivable that our findings for RNA may apply for nucleic acids in general.

Safety and tolerability of FLT3 ligand have been shown in healthy human donors (46, 47) and cancer patients (48–51). Two clinical trials in cancer patients combined peptide vaccination with FLT3 ligand as adjuvant but failed to augment antigen-specific T-cell immunity, which was attributed to the nonactivated state of FLT3 ligand–mobilized DCs (50, 52). By addition of the TLR7 ligand imiquimod to a peptide vaccine plus FLT3 ligand, the lack of peptide-specific T-cell responses could be overcome in a melanoma trial (53). Similar data have been obtained when DNA vaccines were combined with FLT3 ligand (44). Future studies have to show whether the property of RNA to trigger TLR signaling pathways in conjunction with the adjuvant effect of FLT3 ligand may further improve vaccine potency in the clinical setting as well.

In summary, these unexpected findings not only are of high relevance for design of future RNA-based cancer vaccine protocols but also contribute to a better conceptual understanding of adjuvant strategies.




Footnotes:

Conflicts of Interest:

U. Sahin (founder and chief executive officer) and C. Huber (founder) are associated with Ribological, BioNTech AG (Mainz, Germany), a company that develops RNA-based cancer vaccines in the indicated functions. U. Sahin, S. Kreiter, Ö. Türeci, and A. Selmi are inventors on a patent application, in which parts of this article are covered. The other authors disclosed no potential conflicts of interest.

Grant Support
This work was supported by the by the GO-Bio program of the Federal Ministry of Education and Research.

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Acknowledgments:

We thank Paul-Ehrlich Institute (Langen, Germany) for providing IFNAR?/? mice and U. Kalinke (Twincore, Hannover, Germany) for scientific advice. We also thank M. Holzmann, M. C. Rethagen, and M. Brkic for excellent technical assistance.

Footnotes:

Note: Supplementary data for this article are available at Cancer Research Online:

http://cancerres.aacrjournals.org/content/71/19/6132/suppl/DC1




References:

1. Conry RM, Lobuglio AF, Wright M, Sumerel L, Pike MJ, Feng JN, et al.Characterization of a messenger-RNA polynucleotide vaccine vector. Cancer Res 1995;55:1397–400.

2. Hoerr I, Obst R, Rammensee HG, Jung G. In vivo application of RNA leads to induction of specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes and antibodies. Eur J Immunol 2000;30:1–7.

3. Carralot JP, Probst J, Hoerr I, Scheel B, Teufel R, Jung G, et al.Polarization of immunity induced by direct injection of naked sequence-stabilized mRNA vaccines. Cell Mol Life Sci 2004;61:2418–24.

4. Kuhn AN, Diken M, Kreiter S, Selmi A, Kowalska J, Jemielity J, et al.Phosphorothioate cap analogs increase stability and translational efficiency of RNA vaccines in immature dendritic cells and induce superior immune responses in vivo . Gene Ther 2010;17:961–71.

5. Kreiter S, Selmi A, Diken M, Koslowski M, Britten CM, Huber C, et al.Intranodal vaccination with naked antigen-encoding RNA elicits potent prophylactic and therapeutic antitumoral immunity. Cancer Res 2010;70:9031–40.

6. Fotin-Mleczek M, Duchardt KM, Lorenz C, Pfeiffer R, Ojkic-Zrna S, Probst J, et al.Messenger RNA-based vaccines with dual activity induce balanced TLR-7 dependent adaptive immune responses and provide antitumor activity. J Immunother 2011;34:1–15.

7. Weide B, Carralot JP, Reese A, Scheel B, Eigentler TK, Hoerr I, et al.Results of the first phase I/II clinical vaccination trial with direct injection of mRNA. J Immunother 2008;31:180–8.

8. Weide B, Pascolo S, Scheel B, Derhovanessian E, Pflugfelder A, Eigentler TK, et al.Direct injection of protamine-protected mRNA: results of a phase 1/2 vaccination trial in metastatic melanoma patients. J Immunother 2009;32:498–507.

9. Rittig SM, Haentschel M, Weimer KJ, Heine A, Muller MR, Brugger W, et al.Intradermal vaccinations with RNA coding for TAA generate CD8(+) and CD4(+) immune responses and induce clinical benefit in vaccinated patients. Mol Ther 2010;19:990–9.

10. Holtkamp S, Kreiter S, Selmi A, Simon P, Koslowski M, Huber C, et al.Modification of antigen-encoding RNA increases stability, translational efficacy, and T-cell stimulatory capacity of dendritic cells. Blood 2006;108:4009–17.

11. Kreiter S, Selmi A, Diken M, Sebastian M, Osterloh P, Schild H, et al.Increased antigen presentation efficiency by coupling antigens to MHC class I trafficking signals. J Immunol 2008;180:309–18.

12. Diken M, Kreiter S, Selmi A, Britten CM, Huber C, Tureci O, et al.Selective uptake of naked vaccine RNA by dendritic cells is driven by macropinocytosis and abrogated upon DC maturation. Gene Ther 2011;18:702–8.

13. Lyman SD, James L, Vanden Bos T, de VP, Brasel K, Gliniak B, et al.Molecular cloning of a ligand for the flt3/flk-2 tyrosine kinase receptor: a proliferative factor for primitive hematopoietic cells. Cell 1993;75:1157–67.

14. Hannum C, Culpepper J, Campbell D, Mcclanahan T, Zurawski S, Bazan JF, et al.Ligand for FLT3 FLK2 receptor tyrosine kinase regulates growth of hematopoietic stem-cells and is encoded by variant RNAs. Nature 1994;368:643–8.

15. Matthews W, Jordan CT, Wiegand GW, Pardoll D, Lemischka IR. A receptor tyrosine kinase specific to hematopoietic stem and progenitor cell-enriched populations. Cell 1991;65:1143–52.

16. Gregory SH, Sagnimeni AJ, Zurowski NB, Thomson AW. Flt3 ligand pretreatment promotes protective immunity to Listeria monocytogenes. Cytokine 2001;13:202–8.

17. Parajuli P, Pisarev V, Sublet J, Steffel A, Varney M, Singh R, et al.Immunization with wild-type p53 gene sequences coadministered with Flt3 ligand induces an antigen-specific type 1 T-cell response. Cancer Res 2001;61:8227–34.

18. Merad M, Sugie T, Engleman EG, Fong L. In vivo manipulation of dendritic cells to induce therapeutic immunity. Blood 2002;99:1676–82.

19. Fong L, Hou Y, Rivas A, Benike C, Yuen A, Fisher GA, et al.Altered peptide ligand vaccination with Flt3 ligand expanded dendritic cells for tumor immunotherapy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2001;98:8809–14.

20. Jefford M, Schnurr M, Toy T, Masterman KA, Shin A, Beecroft T, et al.Functional comparison of DCs generated in vivo with Flt3 ligand or in vitro from blood monocytes: differential regulation of function by specific classes of physiologic stimuli. Blood 2003;102:1753–63.

21. Mckenna HJ, Morrissey PJ. Flt3 ligand plus IL-7 supports the expansion of murine thymic B cell progenitors that can mature intrathymically. J Immunol 1998;160:4801–9.

22. Yu H, Fehniger TA, Fuchshuber P, Thiel KS, Vivier E, Carson WE, et al.Flt3 ligand promotes the generation of a distinct CD34(+) human natural killer cell progenitor that responds to interleukin-15. Blood 1998;92:3647–57.

23. Mosley RL, Parajuli P, Pisarev V, Chavez J, Meeks A, Steffel A, et al.Flt3 ligand augmentation of T cell mitogenesis and expansion of type 1 effector/memory T cells. Int Immunopharmacol 2002;2:925–40.

24. Parajuli P, Mosley RL, Pisarev V, Chavez J, Ulrich A, Varney M, et al.Flt3 ligand and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor preferentially expand and stimulate different dendritic and T-cell subsets. Exp Hematol 2001;29:1185–93.

25. Pulendran B, Smith JL, Jenkins M, Schoenborn M, Maraskovsky E, Maliszewski CR. Prevention of peripheral tolerance by a dendritic cell growth factor: flt3 ligand as an adjuvant. J Exp Med 1998;188:2075–82.

26. Fong CL, Hui KM. Generation of potent and specific cellular immune responses via in vivo stimulation of dendritic cells by pNGVL3-hFLex plasmid DNA and immunogenic peptides. Gene Ther 2002;9:1127–38.

27. Sumida SM, McKay PF, Truitt DM, Kishko MG, Arthur JC, Seaman MS, et al.Recruitment and expansion of dendritic cells in vivo potentiate the immunogenicity of plasmid DNA vaccines. J Clin Invest 2004;114:1334–42.

28. Bach P, Kamphuis E, Odermatt B, Sutter G, Buchholz CJ, Kalinke U. Vesicular stomatitis virus glycoprotein displaying retrovirus-like particles induce a type I IFN receptor-dependent switch to neutralizing IgG antibodies. J Immunol 2007;178:5839–47.

29. Kreiter S, Konrad T, Sester M, Huber C, Tureci O, Sahin U. Simultaneous ex vivo quantification of antigen-specific CD4 and CD8(+) T cell responses using in vitro transcribed RNA. Cancer Immunol Immunother 2007;56:1577–87.

30. Koslowski M, Sahin U, Huber C, Tureci O. The human X chromosome is enriched for germline genes expressed in premeiotic germ cells of both sexes. Hum Mol Genet 2006;15:2392–9.

31. Robinson SN, Chavez JM, Pisarev VM, Mosley RL, Rosenthal GJ, Blonder JM, et al.Delivery of Flt3 ligand (Flt3L) using a poloxamer-based formulation increases biological activity in mice. Bone Marrow Transplant 2003;31:361–9.

32. Lyman SD, James L, Johnson L, Brasel K, Devries P, Escobar SS, et al.Cloning of the human homolog of the murine flt3 ligand—a growth-factor for early hematopoietic progenitor cells. Blood 1994;83:2795–801.

33. Mckenna HJ, Stocking KL, Miller RE, Brasel K, De ST, Maraskovsky E, et al.Mice lacking flt3 ligand have deficient hematopoiesis affecting hematopoietic progenitor cells, dendritic cells, and natural killer cells. Blood 2000;95:3489–97.

34. Curtin JF, King GD, Barcia C, Liu C, Hubert FX, Guillonneau C, et al.Fms-like tyrosine kinase 3 ligand recruits plasmacytoid dendritic cells to the brain. J Immunol 2006;176:3566–77.

35. Luster AD, Leder P. IP-10, a -C-X-C- chemokine, elicits a potent thymus-dependent antitumor response in vivo . J Exp Med 1993;178:1057–65.

36. Farber JM. Mig and IP-10: CXC chemokines that target lymphocytes. J Leukoc Biol 1997;61:246–57.

37. Rochman I, Paul WE, Ben Sasson SZ. IL-6 increases primed cell expansion and survival. J Immunol 2005;174:4761–7.

38.? Kim JJ, Nottingham LK, Sin JI, Tsai A, Morrison L, Oh J, et al.CD8 positive T cells influence antigen-specific immune responses through the expression of chemokines. J Clin Invest 1998;102:1112–24.

39. Sallusto F, Cella M, Danieli C, Lanzavecchia A. Dendritic cells use macropinocytosis and the mannose receptor to concentrate macromolecules in the major histocompatibility complex class II compartment: downregulation by cytokines and bacterial products. J Exp Med 1995;182:389–400.

40. Brossart P, Bevan MJ. Presentation of exogenous protein antigens on major histocompatibility complex class I molecules by dendritic cells: pathway of presentation and regulation by cytokines. Blood 1997;90:1594–9.

41. Quezada SA, Peggs KS, Curran MA, Allison JP. CTLA4 blockade and GM-CSF combination immunotherapy alters the intratumor balance of effector and regulatory T cells. J Clin Invest 2006;116:1935–45.

42. Curran MA, Allison JP. Tumor vaccines expressing flt3 ligand synergize with ctla-4 blockade to reject preimplanted tumors. Cancer Res 2009;69:7747–55.

43. Berhanu A, Huang J, Alber SM, Watkins SC, Storkus WJ. Combinational FLt3 ligand and granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor treatment promotes enhanced tumor infiltration by dendritic cells and antitumor CD8(+) T-cell cross-priming but is ineffective as a therapy. Cancer Res 2006;66:4895–903.

44. Kwissa M, Amara RR, Robinson HL, Moss B, Alkan S, Jabbar A, et al.Adjuvanting a DNA vaccine with a TLR9 ligand plus Flt3 ligand results in enhanced cellular immunity against the simian immunodeficiency virus. J Exp Med 2007;204:2733–46.

45. Nayak BP, Sailaja G, Jabbar AM. Augmenting the immunogenicity of DNA vaccines: role of plasmid-encoded Flt-3 ligand, as a molecular adjuvant in genetic vaccination. Virology 2006;348:277–88.

46. Maraskovsky E, Daro E, Roux E, Teepe M, Maliszewski CR, Hoek J, et al.In vivo generation of human dendritic cell subsets by Flt3 ligand. Blood 2000;96:878–84.

47. Pulendran B, Banchereau J, Burkeholder S, Kraus E, Guinet E, Chalouni C, et al.Flt3-ligand and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor mobilize distinct human dendritic cell subsets in vivo . J Immunol 2000;165:566–72.

48. Morse MA, Nair S, Fernandez-Casal M, Deng Y, St PM, Williams R, et al.Preoperative mobilization of circulating dendritic cells by Flt3 ligand administration to patients with metastatic colon cancer. J Clin Oncol 2000;18:3883–93.

49. Freedman RS, Vadhan-Raj S, Butts C, Savary C, Melichar B, Verschraegen C, et al.Pilot study of Flt3 ligand comparing intraperitoneal with subcutaneous routes on hematologic and immunologic responses in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis and mesotheliomas. Clin Cancer Res 2003;9:5228–37.

50. McNeel DG, Knutson KL, Schiffman K, Davis DR, Caron D, Disis ML. Pilot study of an HLA-A2 peptide vaccine using Flt3 ligand as a systemic vaccine adjuvant. J Clin Immunol 2003;23:62–72.

51. Higano CS, Vogelzang NJ, Sosman JA, Feng A, Caron D, Small EJ. Safety and biological activity of repeated doses of recombinant human Flt3 ligand in patients with bone scan-negative hormone-refractory prostate cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2004;10:1219–25.

52. Disis ML, Rinn K, Knutson KL, Davis D, Caron D, de la Rosa C, et al.Flt3 ligand as a vaccine adjuvant in association with HER-2/neu peptide-based vaccines in patients with HER-2/neu-overexpressing cancers. Blood 2002;99:2845–50.

53. Shackleton M, Davis ID, Hopkins W, Jackson H, Dimopoulos N, Tai T, et al.The impact of imiquimod, a Toll-like receptor-7 ligand (TLR7L), on the immunogenicity of melanoma peptide vaccination with adjuvant Flt3 ligand. Cancer Immun 2004;4:9.


NetworkEditors' Perspectives: "RNA and adjuvants for antigen-specific cancer immunotherapy in mice".

This exciting study in mice by Sebastian Kreiter,  Mustafa Diken,  Abderraouf Selmi,  Jan Diekmann ,  Sebastian Attig,  Yves Hüsemann,  Michael Koslowski,  Christoph Huber,  Özlem Türeci,  and Ugur Sahin, builds on previous data utilizing antigen-encoding RNA to activate intra-nodal T and NK lymphocytes for successful immunotherapy of human malignant melanoma cells within host mice.

The new addition of human FLT3-lgG4 to lymph nodes of tumor-bering mice serves as an adjuvant to the RNA vaccine, permitting greatly improved host survival and even cure of the engrafted human malignant melanoma.

Additional References:

1. Frenster JH,  and Rogoway WM,
"In-Vitro Activation and Re-infusion of Autologous Human Lymphocytes".
Lancet Vol. 2, pp. 979-980 (November 2, 1968).

2. Keshgegian AA, Meisner LF, and Frenster JH, (1971),
"Thymidine Reversal of Ribothymidine Inhibition of Lymphocyte Mitosis",

3. Stanley DA, Frenster JH, and Rigas DA, (1971),
"Localization of 3H-Phytohemagglutinin within Human Lymphocytes and Monocytes",

4. Frenster JH,
"Ultrastructural Probes of  Chromatin within Living Human Lymphocytes".
Nature Vol. 236, No. 67, pp. 175-176, (April 12, 1972).

5. Archibald RB, and Frenster JH,
"Quantitative Ultrastructural Analysis of In-Vivo Lymphocyte-Reed-Sternberg Cell Interactions in Hodgkin's Disease." Natl. Cancer Inst. Monogr. 36: 239-245 (1973).

6, Masek MA, Rhoades DJ, and Frenster JH, "In-Vivo Macrophage Interactions with Lymphocytes in Hodgkin's Disease", Proc. Am. Assoc. Cancer Res. 14: 8 (1973).

7. Frenster JH, Nakatsu SL, and Masek MA,
"Ultrastructural Probes of DNA Templates within Human Bone Marrow and Lymph Node Cells".
Advances in Cell and Molecular Biology", vol. 3, pp. 1-19 (1974).

8. Nakatsu SL, Masek MA, Landrum S, and Frenster JH,
"Activity of DNA Templates During Cell Division and Cell Differentiation".
Nature, 248 : 334-335 (1974).

9. Frenster JH,
"Ultrastuctural Probes of Gene De-Repression within Human Leukemia and Lymphoma Cells."
11th International Cancer Congress, Florence, Italy, October, 1974.

10. Frenster JH,
"Model of Single-Stranded Integration of Oncogenic Viral Genomes",
Biophys. J. vol. 15: 137a (1975).

11. Frenster JH,
"Phytohemagglutinin-Activated Autochthonous Lymphocytes for Systemic Immunotherapy of  Human Neoplasms", Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 277: 45-51 (1976).

12. Frenster JH, Papalian MM, Masek MA, and Frenster JA,
"Electron Microscopic Analysis of Lymph Node Cellular Activity in Hodgkin's Disease."
Journal of the National Cancer Institute, vol. 63, pp. 331-335, (Aug. 1979).

13. Frenster JH, Papalian MM, Masek MA, and Frenster JA, "Asymmetry of Intra-Nuclear Function during Immune Lymphocyte Activation", Biophys. J. vol. 25, no. 2, part 2, p. 228a, Feb. 1979.

14. Frenster JH, "Single-Cell Analysis of DNase I-Sensitive Sites During Neoplastic Cell Differentiation within Hodgkin's Disease Lymph Nodes", Leukemia Reviews International, Rich MA, Editor, Volume 1, pp. 22-23, (Marcel Dekker, Inc. New York/1983).

15. Frenster JH, 2005
"Activated T-Lymphocyte Immunotherapy".

16. Frenster JH, "Biophysics of Cancer".
 




Conclusions from Embryoma Genomics:

1. Each cell retains all of its embryonic genes for a lifetime.

2. Controls for embryonic genes are often absent in adults.

3. Uncontrolled embryonic genes can replicate wildly.

4.  Replicating genes participate in  intra-cellular competition.

5.  The basis for gene competition is selective transcription.

6.  MicroRNAs can reprogram embryomic transcription.

7.  Gene reprogramming can produce normal phenotypes.

8.  Normal phenotypes can by-pass chromosomal lesions.

9.  MicroRNA therapy may need to be permanent.

10. Transplantation of microRNAs could be preferred.

http://www.embryomas.net/




Conclusions from Euchromatin Thermodynamic Pathways.

1. Pathways within cell genomes involve a flow of information.

2. Information can flow by direct contact or by third parties.

3. Direct contact within whole genomes is difficult to regulate.

4. DNA-DNA direct contects are influenced by agents.

5. Nuclear agents include hydrophilic ionic and hydrophobic conforming ligands.

6. Third parties within genomes involve RNAs and proteins.

7.  RNAs and proteins are easy to regulate or reverse.

8.  Information can be shared, lost, or transformed.

9. System information can be hidden during system isolation.

10.  Local information can be permanently lost during system entropy.

http://www.cancerbiophysics.net/




Further Topics in:  Euchromatin,  active DNA, and  RNA  ribo-regulators:

Links to Current Research in Euchromatin:
Links to Euchromatin Activator RNA Reviews:
Links to Euchromatin Activator RNA Research:
Links to Ultrastructural Probes of DNase I-Sensitive Sites:
Links to RNA as a Therapeutic Agent:
Links to Hodgkin Lymphoma Immuno-Pathology:
Links to Activated T-Lymphocyte Immunotherapy:
Links to Medical Systems Biology:
Links to Selective Gene Transcription:
Links to RNA-Induced Epigenetics:
Links to RNA-Induced Embryogenesis:
Links to RNA and Biological Causality:
Links to Reprogramming and Neoplasia:

A Brief History of Activator RNA:

"Ultrastructural Probes of Active DNA Sites, and the RNA Activators of DNA".
(PowerPoint Presentation).


Top of Page - Euchromatin NetworkEuchromatin ResearchResearch in Quantitative Radiology


For Further Information and Feedback:

Jeannette A. Hovsepian, M.D.
E-mail: frensasc@ix.netcom.com
Phone:  +1 650 367 6483




euchromatin: "the most active portion of the genome within the cell nucleus".
embryoma:  "adult neoplasm expressing one or more embryo-exclusive genes".
entropy:  "maximum entropy defines the isolated reaction steady-state equilibrium".
EMT: "activated embryonic gene network driving cancer progression".
enhancers: "long noncoding RNAs capable of activating gene transcription".